search for: v3.0.0

I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v3.0.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal)! "arsenal" has experienced some major growth in the last few months, starting with the release of v2.0.0 in January. We tried to maintain backwards compatibility wherever possible, but had to eliminate it in some places. With that said, here's the

I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v3.0.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal)! "arsenal" has experienced some major growth in the last few months, starting with the release of v2.0.0 in January. We tried to maintain backwards compatibility wherever possible, but had to eliminate it in some places. With that said, here's the

I'm running a Samba 3.0.0 server in production in security = ADS mode against a W2k ADS server. Works just fine, thanks! We're sort of under pressure to regrade to a 2003 AD server, which sent me trying stuff out a bit. Meager results. The 3.0.0 I have (linked with MIT krb5-1.2.8) refuses to verify incoming tickets: [2003/10/28 16:27:36, 3]

Hello, I am using glusterfs v3.0.0 and having some problems with random directory/files. They work fine for some time ( hours ) and them suddenly gets unavailable: # ls -lh ls: cannot access MyDir: No such file or directory total 107M d????????? ? ? ? ? ? MyDir ( long dir list, intentionally hidden ) At the logs i get a lot of messages like those ones: [2010-01-07

Having a problem getting v3.0.0(or pre3) to compile on a Solaris 8 box, tried Sun compilers and Solaris compilers.. Recompiled/Re-installed Kerberos all roads lead to the same error compiling Samba, it gets about 2/3 of the way done and spews... Compiling libads/kerberos_verify.c libads/kerberos_verify.c: In function `create_keytab': libads/kerberos_verify.c:77: structure has no member

I'm getting some warnings: NOTICE[xxx]: File rtp.c, Line 264 (process_rfc3389): RFC3389 support incomplete. Turn off on client if possible Asterisk Version: CVS-01/06/04-13:50:26 Cisco ATA 186 version: v3.0.0 atasip (Build 031210A) Is this something I should be concerned about? Anyone know how to "turn off" the RFC3389 support on the ata 186? Thanks!

We've been holding back on this release to coincide with the Asterisk 1.4.0 release. This is mostly a compatibility release, but there are a few new features: * No longer requires register_globals in PHP * Separated code from configuration settings in ./lib/defines.php (hopefully this will make future upgrades easier) * Migrated all database interfaces to PEAR::DB which

On 1/3/07, asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com < asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Dan Austin" <Dan_Austin@Phoenix.com> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:33:02 -0800 > Subject:

Hello List, Label me a newb, but how do you install Rails 3 on your Mac? Google sent me to these URLs: http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2010/2/5/rails-3-0-beta-release/ http://guides.rails.info/3_0_release_notes.html http://asciicasts.com/episodes/200-rails-3-beta-and-rvm From early Feb 2010 I see this short recipe: gem install tzinfo builder memcache-client rack rack-test rack-mount erubis mail

Before I undertake this upgrade I thought I would see if anyone has any advice on how to do this on a production system. Maybe someone has already "fought this dragon". Current config Gluster V3.0.0. This has been in production for over 16 months: 2 servers with 8 x 2TB hard drives (bricks) replicated svr1:vol1 <-> srv2:vol1 -> rbrick1 svr1:vol2 <-> srv2:vol2 ->

In Rails < 3, I could have a validation on model such as: validates_presence_of :name, :message => "some custom message here" If I try something similar in Rails 3: validates :name, :presence => true , :message => "some other custom message" obviously, it throws an exception. So the question is, in Rails 3, how to you give a simple custom message? Do I need to

Good morning all, I?m using rsync v3.0.0 on both ends. The source is Fedora Core 4 and the destination is MacOS 10.5.2. I?m trying to sync a file system with roughly 5,000,000 files checking in about 1.2TB. I use the command rsync ?avP ?e shh root@mustang:/filevault . From my MacOS machine and I get the following after about 400GB has been copied:

hi list i've been banging my head against the wall trying to setup a samba PDC with ldapsam backend for the last couple of weeks here is the background: machine is a debian woody samba v3.0.0 compiled qith following configure: ./configure --prefix=/usr/ --localstatedir=/var --with-configdir=/etc/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-codepagedir=/etc/codepages --with-acl-support

Hello, I have a Samba/LDAP problem. I' using Samba v3.0.0 with LDAP backend OpenLDAP v2.1.30. I have 4 PDC and several BDCs in different buildings. Each of these has a copy of the LDAP directory that I am replicating from a master LDAP server. The problem I ran into is that the LDAP master is not on the PDC it is on a standalone server that I also use for Cyrus IMAP authentication and some

SAMBA v3.0.0 on Solaris 10 I have a SAMBA share that I am accessing on Windows. When a Windows user creates a read-only file, they are unable to change the persmissions back to read/write. When I login in to the UNIX side, there user/group permissions look correct. Any ideas? Here is the smb.conf [global] workgroup = XXXXXXXXXXX security = DOMAIN password server =

Could some please confirm that this behavior is incorrect. I am seeing issues where it appears that asterisk is not following the Record-route on it's reply messages. Please let me know if you require any other information. Thanks Example: xxx.yyy.154.243(PSTN-GW) <--sip--> xxx.yyy.77.23(Asterisk) <--sip--> xxx.yyy.91.74(SNOM or SER proxy) <--sip---->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Summary: Potential Buffer Overruns in Samba 3.0 and Samba 2.2 CVE ID: CAN-2004-0600, CAN-2004-0686 ~ (http://cve.mitre.org/) - ------------- CAN-2004-0600 - ------------- Affected Versions: >= v3.0.2 The internal routine used by the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT v3.0.2 and later) to decode the base64 data

Hi, From v3.0.0 onwards the hash function implemented by Rsync was changed from MD4 to MD5 (http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.0-NEWS). My understanding is that MD5 is a more secure, slower version of MD4 but I am not convinced that the added security of MD5 would alone have merited the change from MD4 (particularly since MD4 is ~30% faster than MD5). I wonder if I am missing other

(Thanks to Andrea Bolognani for bringing this to my attention) from https://libvirt.org/news.html: * v3.0.0 (unreleased) - qemu: Use virtio-pci by default for aarch64 mach-virt guests - virtio-pci provides several advantages over virtio-mmio, such as the ability to hotplug devices and improved performance. While opting in to virtio-pci has been possible for a while,

I''m working on a new Rails (v3.0.0.rc) application using the Devise (v1.1.1) gem. In my application I have setup a User model which includes the person''s e-mail address and name. I have also setup the following models that I''d like to attach to the User: - Address (street, city, state, zip code) - Interest (name) - Donation (date of donation, amount) My question is