Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "v2df".
Did you mean:
b2df
2011 Apr 09
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg/llvm-gfortran/gfortran benchmarks
...x141d01a50 constant 64>
unit size <integer_cst 0x141d01a78 constant 8>
align 64 symtab 0 alias set 2 canonical type 0x141d1e0a8 precision 64
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x141d1e2a0> reference_to_this <reference_type 0x141e720a8>>
V2DF
size <integer_cst 0x141d01c58 constant 128>
unit size <integer_cst 0x141d01c80 constant 16>
align 128 symtab 0 alias set 2 canonical type 0x141d6ad20 nunits 2
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x141d74930>>
arg 0 <ssa_name 0x143846580...
2011 Apr 09
3
[LLVMdev] dragonegg/llvm-gfortran/gfortran benchmarks
On 4/9/2011 6:09 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on
> those where it does much better than dragonegg?
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
Also, does -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns get Dragonegg to
match GCC performance where GCC was faster?
Marcus