search for: v21

...1 -27.3 14.4 2 29.0 -38.1 [[2]] V1 V2 1 14.4 29.0 2 -38.1 -3.4 [[3]] V1 V2 1 29.0 -38.1 2 -3.4 55.1 [[4]] V1 V2 1 -38.1 -3.4 2 55.1 -1.0 [[5]] V1 V2 1 -3.4 55.1 2 -1.0 21.9 [[6]] V1 V2 1 55.1 -1.0 2 21.9 -10.9 ... > xx <- unlist(x) V11 V12 V21 V22 V11 V12 V21 V22 V11 V12 V21 V22 -27.3 29.0 14.4 -38.1 14.4 -38.1 29.0 -3.4 29.0 -3.4 -38.1 55.1 V11 V12 V21 V22 V11 V12 V21 V22 V11 V12 V21 V22 -38.1 55.1 -3.4 -1.0 -3.4 -1.0 55.1 21.9 55.1 21.9 -1.0 -10.9 V11 V12 V21 V22 V11...

...00000 t30ind: no-signal 116.747493 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00001 t30ind: ced 116.757588 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00002 t30ind: no-signal 117.387730 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00003 t30ind: v21-preamble 117.397857 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00003 t30ind: v21-preamble 117.407640 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00003 t30ind: v21-preamble 117.435598 28:92:4a:34:19:72 -> ac:f2:c5:35:ed:66 ARP Who has 192.168.196.94? Tell 192...

...vectors vspltish v16,0 ; v16: zero vector li r10,-12 lvsr v17,r10,r8 ; v17: result shift vector lvsl v18,r10,r3 ; v18: residual shift back vector li r10,-4 stw r7,-4(r9) lvewx v19,r10,r9 ; v19: lp_quantization vector L1200: vmulosh v20,v0,v8 ; v20: sum vector bcctr 20,0 L1300: vmulosh v21,v7,v15 vsldoi v15,v15,v14,4 ; increment history vaddsws v20,v20,v21 L1301: vmulosh v21,v6,v14 vsldoi v14,v14,v13,4 vaddsws v20,v20,v21 L1302: vmulosh v21,v5,v13 vsldoi v13,v13,v12,4 vaddsws v20,v20,v21 L1303: vmulosh v21,v4,v12 vsldoi v12,v12,v11,4 vaddsws v20,v20,v21 L1304: vmulosh...

...re is capable of T.38, as is my ITSP; Asterisk sits in the middle, of course. Asterisk is in the same private subnet as the local fax software and talks to the ITSP through a NAT'd connection. I think I'm almost there, but I am experiencing something strange: Asterisk is not forwarding the v21 preamble and the other v21 data to the local fax software. Is there any typical configuration error which could be the cause? I have captured the call flow and have seen the following so far: First, the fax software invites Asterisk for G711, then Asterisk invites the ITSP's SIP gateway for G...

...n't. Following a suggestion I even tried refactoring of the grouping variable (inter) after I created the subset. It didn't work. I have no other factor variables in the model. I really have got no clue what could be wrong. There is a sample from my data: > dnNew Grouped Data: y ~ v11 + v21 + v22 + v23 | inter v11 v21 v22 v23 inter 4 5.55186635 5.6620022 24.18033 5.003409 1 13 2.03852426 5.6620022 24.18033 5.003409 1 15 2.19825772 7.5676798 31.03986 4.746891 2 16 4.51368278 7.5676798 31.03986 4.746891 2 18 3.35322702 7.5676798 31.03986 4.746891...

...--------->| | | |..............| |T.38 | |..............| |[t.38]no signal |<-------------| |[t.38]no signal |------------->| |[t.38]CED | |<-------------| |[t.38]V21-preamble |------------->| | | | | On the other hand, with some faxes, the re-INVITE is sent by Asterisk and it looks that there is something wrong in the T.38 setup that makes the fax reception fail after the permitted retries. The FAXERROR v...

...some questions about similar subjects to this list, and I have got helpful answers; people told me that I should *not* enable the fax *gateway* feature if both endpoints are capable of T.38. On the other hand, I have read (at multiple places) the the *gateway* code is responsible for detecting the v21 preamble. How does this fit together? AFAIK, when both ends support T.38, you don't need the gateway and can turn to passthough mode. In passthrough mode, asterisk does not need to detect anything. Just take the packet it receives and pass the payload to the other end of the call. Cheers, Fr...

Sadly the latest optimization broke completely everything. The asm code isn't gas compliant. the libFLAC linker script has a typo, disabling the asm optimization and/or altivec won't let a correct build anyway. Instant fixes for the asm stuff: sed -i -e"s:;:\#:" on the lpc_asm.s to load address instead of addis+ori you could use lis and la and PLEASE use the @l(register)

...0.7523 -3.675 0.000238 *** ... ... ... ... ... flg.a21 0.7898 0.4948 1.596 0.110475 flg.d.na21 0.2097 0.7336 0.286 0.774963 flg.v21 0.3928 0.5257 0.747 0.454994 flg.cc21 -0.8547 1.4954 -0.572 0.567625 flg.a11 0.7051 0.4889 1.442 0.149221 flg.d.na11 1.3582 0.5429 2.502 0....

On 01/09/2018 10:42 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Wei Wang wrote: >> - enable OOM to free inflated pages maintained in the local temporary >> list. > I do want to see it before applying this patch. Fine, then what do you think of the method I shared in your post here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10140731/ Michael, could we merge patch 3-5 first? > > Please

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:44:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: > > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> > > > > The eXtensible Bitmap is a sparse bitmap representation which is > > efficient for set bits which tend to cluster. It supports up to > > 'unsigned

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy at infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:44:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: >> > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> >> > >> > The eXtensible Bitmap is a sparse bitmap representation

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> > > The eXtensible Bitmap is a sparse bitmap representation which is > efficient for set bits which tend to cluster. It supports up to > 'unsigned long' worth of bits. > lib/xbitmap.c | 444

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> > > The eXtensible Bitmap is a sparse bitmap representation which is > efficient for set bits which tend to cluster. It supports up to > 'unsigned long' worth of bits. > lib/xbitmap.c | 444

...lly found the partial derivatives: > f11 <- deriv(FIh, "Ih") > f12 <- deriv(FIh, "Iv") > f21 <- deriv(FIv, "Ih") > f22 <- deriv(FIv, "Iv") > v11 <- deriv(VIh, "Ih") > v12 <- deriv(VIh, "Iv") > v21 <- deriv(VIv, "Ih") > v22 <- deriv(VIv, "Iv") Next I would like to put these partial derivatives into two matrices, F and V: > F <- Expr("{{f11, f12}, {f21, f22}}") > V <- Expr("{{v11, v12}, {v21, v22}}") Finally, I would like to f...

On 01/11/2018 07:06 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Wei Wang wrote: >> Michael, could we merge patch 3-5 first? > No! I'm repeatedly asking you to propose only VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG changes. > Please don't ignore me. > > > > Patch 4 depends on patch 2. Thus, back to patch 2. There is not strict dependence per se. I plan to split the two features into 2 series, and post

...## the before C value are used to estimate the denominator degrees of ## freedom (v2); resulting two possible cases. Co = (((p-1) * (p+2)) / (6 * (g-1))) * (suma2 - (1 / (deno^2))) if (Co - (C^2) >= 0) { v1 = as.integer((p * (p + 1) * (g - 1)) / 2) ## Numerator DF. v21 = as.integer(trunc((v1 + 2) / (Co - (C^2)))) ## Denominator DF. F1 = MB * ((1 - C - (v1 / v21)) / v1) ## F approximation. ## Significance value associated to the observed F statistic. P1 = pf(F1, v1, v21, lower=FALSE) cat('\n----------------------------------------------...

Provide a splice_read stub for ocfs2. This emits trace lines and does an atime lock/update before calling filemap_splice_read(). Splicing from direct I/O is handled by the caller. A couple of new tracepoints are added for this purpose. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com> cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> cc: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk> cc: Jens

...6028534100000 p29 = B * 0.0009623383079593670000 p30 = B * 0.0008799959715670280000 ################Individual infection number################ v0 =0 v1 =1 v2 =2 v3 =3 v4 =4 v5 =5 v6 =6 v7 =7 v8 =8 v9 =9 v10 =10 v11 =11 v12 =12 v13 =13 v14 =14 v15 =15 v16 =16 v17 =17 v18 =18 v19 =19 v20 =20 v21 =21 v22 =22 v23 =23 v24 =24 v25 =25 v26 =26 v27 =27 v28 =28 v29 =29 v30 =30 #Set conditions of Petri Net N=list() N$M=c(susceptible, infectious, recovered) ################Pre-matrix################ N$Pre=matrix(c(0, 1, 0, v0, 1 , 0 , v1, 1 , 0 , v2, 1 , 0 , v3, 1 , 0 , v4, 1 , 0 , v5, 1 ,...

...../out.vw', namespaces = NULL, target='V102', weight = 'weight', tag = NULL, hard_parse = F) ### error # [1] "sprintf('%f %f |A V1:%f V2:%f V3:%f V4:%f V5:%f V6:%f V7:%f V8:%f V9:%f V10:%f V11:%f V12:%f V13:%f V14:%f V15:%f V16:%f V17:%f V18:%f V19:%f V20:%f V21:%f V22:%f V23:%f V24:%f V25:%f V26:%f V27:%f V28:%f V29:%f V30:%f V31:%f V32:%f V33:%f V34:%f V35:%f V36:%f V37:%f V38:%f V39:%f V40:%f V41:%f V42:%f V43:%f V44:%f V45:%f V46:%f V47:%f V48:%f V49:%f V50:%f V51:%f V52:%f V53:%f V54:%f V55:%f V56:%f V57:%f V58:%f V59:%f V60:%f V61:%f V62:%f V63:%f V6...