Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "uyhnaqqk".
2013 Mar 15
1
flac-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 36
...Os4Jb6SI2CwMeQH/3Cwk11TaXPtR9RWN8y6vw/Q
CPnecOEWsGT/d5Kp4GfQV2iI/15W4v30sulOQvlwCJywVIKee0qMxnWCOjvwIXz1
9zvTHLowfqQaXo0Mh29DM7rrxgzF3DoINSwNA5CVD4eFeXt12ZHDkEvkJCsRV68B
W7zGXKExnHZIwtpjZKmTLFnch6uvwaXMkdPgtQfMoJJ/yuM7JqnLyCmj0QZJVYNf
HGVFjaZpLNaf725BaKVF21NkMwGW07wz7ybKXAKWWvsEhVt7v12XarbWLMEOUDzq
uyhNAqqK+kOAWJeSiM/A6GbsfrQqQq2GQ/uSkwEOYAu0sRpkrps0KnV33S3aJMk=
=6hxo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2013 Mar 15
3
flac-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 36
I don't think you guys should worry too much about messing up old decoders,
but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:06 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev at xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>