Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "uwband".
Did you mean:
uband
2005 May 29
0
cpu utilization across speex versions
...tilization at acceptable levels, unlike 1.0.4 & 1.0.5. Is this behaviour normal? Moreover, does anyone have any figures for minimum system requirements for speex coding in real-time for multiple parties? Or might I be doing something wrong/inefficient?
By the way, the audio settings are: 32KHz uwband mode, 16 bits, Mono, speex quality 8, speex encoder complexity 4 (almost same results with complexity 2 or 1).
Any pointers greatly appreciated, thank you.
-Kemal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments...
2005 May 29
0
cpu utilization across speex versions
...at acceptable levels, unlike 1.0.4 & 1.0.5. Is this behaviour normal? Moreover, does anyone have any figures for minimum system requirements for speex coding in real-time for multiple parties? Or might I be doing something wrong/inefficient?
>
> By the way, the audio settings are: 32KHz uwband mode, 16 bits, Mono, speex quality 8, speex encoder complexity 4 (almost same results with complexity 2 or 1).
>
> Any pointers greatly appreciated, thank you.
>
> -Kemal.