search for: uuuu

We do some routine logfile (syslog) gathering and analysis. I've been looking at extending this to parse the syslog output of dovecot. Hmmm... Ignoring the leading 'date hostname' prefix, some sample lines are: dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<uuuuuu>, method=PLAIN, rip=dd.dd.dd.dd, lip=dd.dd.dd.dd dovecot: IMAP(uuuuuu): Disconnected: Logged out dovecot: IMAP(uuuuuu): Disconnected in IDLE dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login: rip=dd.dd.dd.dd, lip=dd.dd.dd.dd dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<uuuuuu>, method=PLAIN, rip=dd.dd...

...rintserver. samba itself is running fine, but when i try to add the cups printer-drivers for windows i got the following error: System: Debian/sarge with 2.4.20 i686 GNU/Linux samba 3.0.2-2 cupsys 1.1.20final-13 Windows-driver from cups-samba-5.0rc1.tar ssflx01_v2:~# cupsaddsmb -a -v -U uuuu Password for uuuu required to access localhost via SAMBA: Running command: smbclient //localhost/print\$ -N -U'uuu%xxxx' -c 'mkdir W32X86; put /var/spool/cups/tmp/40404c740a656 W32X86/SSFP102.ppd; put /usr/share/cups/drivers/cupsdrv5.dll W32X86/cupsdrv5.dll; put /usr/share/cups/dr...

...917G 88M 871G 1% /mnt The root partition (/dev/md127) only shows 226 G of space. So where has everything gone? [root at nestor:~] # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md125 : active raid1 sdc2[2] sdd2[3] sdb2[1] sda2[0] 204736 blocks super 1.0 [4/4] [UUUU] md126 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0] 4095936 blocks super 1.2 [4/4] [UUUU] md127 : active raid5 sdc3[2] sdb3[1] sdd3[4] sda3[0] 240087552 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] bitmap: 0/1 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk unused devices: &...

...;m joined to the domain and both "net ads testjoin" and "net rpc testjoin" (as well as "wbinfo -t") all agree that the join is good. "wbinfo -u" reports my AD users; "wbinfo -g" reports my AD groups (with the domain prefix removed); "wbinfo -U UUUU" gives me the correct SID for UID UUUU. But here's a funny thing (#1) - "wbinfo -S SSSS" gives me a UID for SID SSSS. However it's not the same UID as, when given to "wbinfo -U UUUU", would return that SID. Duh?...

...917G 88M 871G 1% /mnt The root partition (/dev/md127) only shows 226 G of space. So where has everything gone? [root at nestor:~] # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md125 : active raid1 sdc2[2] sdd2[3] sdb2[1] sda2[0] 204736 blocks super 1.0 [4/4] [UUUU] md126 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0] 4095936 blocks super 1.2 [4/4] [UUUU] md127 : active raid5 sdc3[2] sdb3[1] sdd3[4] sda3[0] 240087552 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] bitmap: 0/1 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk unused devices: &...

...k Haven, Taylor started a new line of aircraft with Taylorcraft Aviation Co. " He asked if there was anything I wanted - tobacco, rum, a priest. As days go by, the officials have grudgingly admitted further blunders in one of the biggest embarrassments for the law enforcement agency in years. uuuu WATCH LITL ON WEDNESDAY DEC 13! Company: L INTL COMPUTERS INC (Other OTC:LITL.PK) Symbol: LITL Mon Close: $0.99 5-day Target: $5 L Reveals 8-Way Processing Professional Mobile Computing Design CALL YOUR BROKER TO PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW!!! LITL WILL DEFINITELY RALLY UP IN THIS BULL MARKET! WATCH...

I happened to be in a Latin American prison, accused of running guns to the freedom fighters. All right, the Capitol Hill officers let down the old side this time. But just try to take a snapshot of a blimp and see what happens to you. uuuu WATCH LITL ON WEDNESDAY DEC 13! Company: L INTL COMPUTERS INC (Other OTC:LITL.PK) Symbol: LITL Mon Close: $0.99 5-day Target: $5 L Reveals 8-Way Processing Professional Mobile Computing Design CALL YOUR BROKER TO PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW!!! LITL WILL DEFINITELY RALLY UP IN THIS BULL MARKET! WATCH...

So, it's advisable to grow cane as near to the factory as possible. He is the fourth person to resign at NFA. They sold it to Russia at virtually give away prices. uuuu WATCH LITL ON WEDNESDAY DEC 13! Company: L INTL COMPUTERS INC (Other OTC:LITL.PK) Symbol: LITL Mon Close: $0.99 5-day Target: $5 L Reveals 8-Way Processing Professional Mobile Computing Design CALL YOUR BROKER TO PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW!!! LITL WILL DEFINITELY RALLY UP IN THIS BULL MARKET! WATCH...

...;ve been submitting a patch t o add a com32 module able to parse the DMI table. I'm starting now the next step : having a way to boot some different menu regarding the dmi structures. I've been looking for some ideas with the ethersel syntax : DEV [DID xxxx:yyyy[/mask]] [RID zz-zz] [SID uuuu:vvvv[/mask]] commandline In other hand, a nice implementation must allow to do : "if my bios is from this_manufacturer and the bios release = 3.4 so I must start the bios update. I think that many configuration will request to test several parameters for choosing the label to start. Does s...

...take compression (gzip/zip) into account, it can alter numbers significantly. perhaps something like this: "loaded/copied/read nnnn MB in tttt seconds (average speed nn MB/s)" or "done reading nnnn MB in tttt seconds (average speed nn MB/s)" "decompressed to mmmm MB in uuuu seconds (average speed mm MB/s)" Bernd

...me passes. :D It's an LVM comprising 4x2TB disks in RAID10 and 4x500GB in RAID10. $ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md1 : active raid10 sdi1[0] sdg1[1] sdf1[3] sdh1[2] 976767872 blocks 64K chunks 2 near-copies [4/4] [UUUU] md0 : active raid10 sda1[2] sdc1[3] sdb1[1] sdd1[0] 3907023872 blocks 64K chunks 2 near-copies [4/4] [UUUU] Disks are 7200RPM SATA disks. It's ~2TB full of data which is mostly rsnapshots of lots of remote hosts, so lots of little files. Cheers, Al.

Hi Samba community, Here is a problem I could not solve. I would like to mount a cifs share to my local Linux machine, which is bound to a windows domain using winbind. The share needs to be mounted by the linux machine's computer account. Here is what I do: # su - DOMAIN\\computer$ [DOMAIN\computercomputer ~]$ <<< i think there is a problem with the bash prompt, skip it for now

..._root_squash) /rsnapshot 10.0.223.0/22(ro,sync,no_root_squash) mdrad info [root at linux-fs01 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md125 : active raid5 sda[3] sdb[2] sdc[1] sdd[0] 134217728 blocks super external:/md127/0 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 0 [4/4] [UUUU] md126 : active raid5 sda[3] sdb[2] sdc[1] sdd[0] 5440012288 blocks super external:/md127/1 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 0 [4/4] [UUUU] md127 : inactive sda[3](S) sdb[2](S) sdd[1](S) sdc[0](S) 20804 blocks super external:imsm unused devices: <none> [root at linux-fs01 ~]# mdad...

Arch = x86_64 CentOS-6.4 We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in hotswap cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP application and DBMS host. The ERP application will likely eventually have web access but at the moment only dedicated client applications can connect to it. I am researching how to best set this system up for use as a production host

...ta=0.90 UUID=ea205046:3c6e78c6:ab84faa4:0da53c7c After a system re-boot, here is the contents of /proc/mdstat # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md125 : active raid1 sdc3[0] 455482816 blocks [2/1] [U_] md0 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[0] sdb1[1] sda1[2] 1000320 blocks [4/4] [UUUU] md127 : active raid1 sdd3[1] sdb3[0] 971747648 blocks [2/2] [UU] md3 : active raid1 sdf1[1] sde1[0] 1003904 blocks [2/2] [UU] md4 : active raid1 sdf3[1] sde3[0] 1948491648 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sda3[1] 455482816 blocks [2/1] [_U] unused devices: <...

...have 4 disks in a RAID5 array. I want to add a 5th. So I did mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/sde1 This worked but, as expected, the disk isn't being used in the raid5 array. md3 : active raid5 sde1[4] sdd4[3] sdc3[2] sdb2[1] sda1[0] 2930279808 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] So then I tried the next step: mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 /dev/md3 But now I have problems... mdadm: Cannot set device size/shape for /dev/md3: Invalid argument Can CentOS 4.6 grow md5 arrays? Or is the kernel and mdadm version too old? ( http://www.economysizegeek.com/2006/07/15/migra...

Hi, I'm having a problem with a Win95 client where I get the following error messages in the log.hostname log file: [1999/07/09 12:46:49, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488) 03407 (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) connect to service XXXX as user jdoe (uid=uuuu, gid=gggg) [1999/07/09 12:46:49, 0] smbd/dir.c:dptr_create(453) dptr_create: returned 0: Error - all new dirptrs in use ? This happens after the client has been connected and using the samba share for a while (a few hours) and then tries to browse the share's directory. The explorer window di...

...000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 aa55 0000200 So far, so normal. This works fine under 2.6.32-220.23.1.el6.x86_64 Personalities : [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md127 : active raid5 sdj3[2] sdi2[1] sdk4[3] sdh1[0] 5860537344 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] However, I just patched to CentOS 6.3 and on reboot this array failed to be built. The 2.6.32-279 kernel complained that /dev/sdj was too similar to /dev/sdj3. But I reboot to -220.23.1 then it works. And, indeed, if I run "mdadm --examine /dev/sdj" then it _does_ look like mdadm thi...

...niel J Blueman > > <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 7:20 pm, wbr...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> RAID details: > >> > >> md8 : active raid10 sda7[0] sdd7[3] sdc7[2] sdb7[1] > >> 62925824 blocks 256K chunks 2 far-copies [4/4] [UUUU] > >> > >> Ext4: > >> mkfs.ext4 -E stride=64,stripe-width=128 /dev/md8 > >> mount -t ext4 -o noatime,auto_da_alloc,commit=600 /dev/md8 /mnt/md8 Here, stripe-width should be 4* stride, not that it''ll make much difference. > >> Reiser3: > &gt...

...ux xenmaster.dimension-x.local 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 09:53:14 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md1 : active raid5 sdk1[2] sdj1[4] sdi1[3] sdh1[0] sdg1[1] 976783616 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU] md0 : active raid5 sdf1[3] sde1[1] sdd1[4](S) sdc1[0] sdb1[2] 2197715712 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] unused devices: <none> here is what dmesg has to say: (some of it looks like repeats but some of it is very slightly different too) BUG: warning at drivers...