search for: uui

Dear all, How do I set the UUI informations for outgoing calls and read the UUI information for incoming call in asterisk? Thanks in advance.. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100531/ffcceeee/attachment.htm

Hi there, Is it possible to manage UUI with asterisk and ISDN (T0 Fritz card). Basically, is it possible to send User to User Information using the D-channel, while making a call?

Hello List, I need to connect with an Avaya PBX (this part is done), and i would like to get and send back User-to-User Information (UUI) with the call. The UUI need because I need to identify the call based on something witch is available on Asterisk and Avaya too. It is possible, or have a better solution? Anybody did it before? Thanks for the help! Zsotya

Hi, I came thru ISDN UUI (User-User Information) protocol which is defined in this RFC - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-17.txt But I don't understand how to use this with Asterisk. Any idea would be much appreciated. Thanks. Gopal. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbe...

OK, so I'll do that... Is there any infos I need to know about chan_sip.c (because I suppose it's it that I need to play with)? Does anyone know an interesting website where I can find infos about UUI in ISDN (with CAPI maybe?) ? Thanks for your help.

...= default > >also have a look at chan_capi.c / USERUSERDATA >My C knowledge is *very* limited, but i could send out something with >some wild patching in chan_capi.c, so it's at least possible... > >> Does anyone know an interesting website where I can find infos about UUI in >> ISDN (with CAPI maybe?) ? > >I guess it's somewhere in ITU Q.931, but i dont have this document ;-( > >I also think this would be a very cool feature (i.e. there's a Simemens PBX >that sends out the callername with UUS1), if i can do something else to help, >pl...

...mParent(). How can this guarantee that it only erase lifetime instrinsics ? -guoqing // The only users of this bitcast/GEP instruction are lifetime intrinsics. // Follow the use/def chain to erase them now instead of leaving it for // dead code elimination later. for (auto UUI = I->user_begin(), UUE = I->user_end(); UUI != UUE;) { Instruction *Inst = cast<Instruction>(*UUI); ++UUI; Inst->eraseFromParent(); } On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > &...

right, so far, here is what I've done: I succeed in take in a new variable the UUS1 field sent with the connection request for incoming calls. It was quite simple afterall... (I just had to find where the data CMSG->Useruserdata is coming in chan_capi.c) Now I would like to know where this field is instanciated for outgoing calls in order to control this step? I am looking for that but I

Hello, I've seen that Nuance SIP audio provider supports additional information (parameters and extra headers) in SIP URIs, using the format: sip:user:password@host:port;uri-param1;uri-param2?header1&header2 For example, sip:1234@myserver.com;extra_header=Uui?Uui=Hello Does Asterisk support this format? Is there a way to retrieve the value of these additional headers, and then decide the action (Dial, Playback, etc.) as desired? (I'm thinking in an "if ... then ... elsif ... else ..."). Thanks, Cerrajetto

----- Original Message ----- > From: "guoqing zhang" <gqzhang81 at gmail.com> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 4:29:16 AM > Subject: [LLVMdev] About user of bitcast/GEP instruction > > Hi, > > > In PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp, it seems to rely on the fact that the > only users of bitcast/GEP instruction are lifetime

Hi, In PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp, it seems to rely on the fact that the only users of bitcast/GEP instruction are lifetime intrinsics (llvm.lifetime.start/end). I did some searching in llvm/test folder, it seems to be true. However, by reading LLVM IR manual, I don't see any restriction stated on the possible user of bitcast/GEP instruction. So my question is who impose the restriction ?

...sdn_api_v5.pdf The Dialogic system is using the U_IES[1] with cc_GetCallInfo() to get the information sent from Paetec, our provider, but the information isn't being sent the same way from the Sangoma card, even though I have it set to pri_net in zapata.conf. Alternatively, we can check the UUI[2] message to see if the Dialogic card will receive it that way. Mike 1. Information Elements (IEs) in CCITT format. The cc_GetCallInfo( ) function retrieves all unprocessed IEs in CCITT format. Be sure to allocate enough memory (up to 256 bytes) to hold the retrieved IEs. The IEs are returned...

Is it possible to send CLID NAME on a PRI? The numbers we send out are being received by telco and propagated, but the names we send out are not showing up. Is this a feature in PRI? Do we need to set PRI_NET instead of PRI_CPE? Is this just not possible? Is this a telco config issue? Thanks for your help... I've read voip-info, and various other sources, and search engines, and google...

...e:728) vcpus = 1 [2011-10-29 21:03:48 26862] DEBUG (image:729) features = [2011-10-29 21:03:48 26862] DEBUG (image:730) flags = 0 [2011-10-29 21:03:48 26862] DEBUG (image:731) superpages = 0 [2011-10-29 21:03:49 26862] INFO (XendDomainInfo:2367) createDevice: vbd : {'uuid': '9fabbd7b-d23e-a24b-34f5-0af402bfeb98', 'bootable': 1, 'driver': 'paravirtualised', 'dev': 'xvda2', 'uname': 'drbd:abook-disk', 'mode': 'w'} [2011-10-29 21:03:49 26862] DEBUG (DevController:95) DevController: wri...

Dear All, I'm integrating avaya commuication manager difinity ver 1.0 with asterisk using B2B E1. following are the details of my H/W, zaptel configs and software installed. Digium TE110p asterisk 1.2.19 cent OS 4.4 zaptel 1.2.18 libpri 1.2.4 etc/zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,cas,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 when i ztcfg -vvv im having this error message and the E1 is not getting up. "cas

This patch series copies the core of the tapdisk process from blktap2, with updates coming from blktap2.5. Signed-off-by: Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@citrix.com>

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

...Q#6H$86X;$)_-Gp%!5&74bUX`1 zd=!J5oG}iy$0QxbB1c$PMRA%TZaL^eKm0ozjmkwvDlYRVOUPmJw2PcI!OKIubjDRi zGi3db?nGCVn-~JNwxmYc%&!T2Hd6>qX(A1t!<LoWml7VsTAOvR+Lr^~dGDon8L$)3 zbb{rE2S)ECn}9WrIwp`fLmExUUm+NV6q*NF26}s0Ox0j#{gBaiu2Xe(pxJsRf7*Z@ zhcP;OcO&lgVCUeSefITG=MW5rM9YddV6|R%i8lTp%qb7l+~HSkHYWUUI<<QH9gpPC zc{X1o7FY%PZWlC54!swxI=cCKdywZKU3e$GF1WL|vuwo{dUqu*wbDWfJ%LxGR(OvT z^Ap>!ZP8!2R(uTv#r%u2XG8143wOV5aC#Nav$rvO80XiDW3yeL)*&{w3EPkee?W%G zPx)G9SoEa!w{qpUf}cpuz!LznU>b!v$NIT&_k&sTq-O at xkw$`@mLZD63ZMn at yeShE z$p2sy6`e6xo}|>v*2{|EP><%x=|XtJo~SD8&(F%tTNOmV...

Someone please say it isn't so. I'm running Samba 2.2.7 on Linux, compiled from source. I use CUPS for my printing needs and I have samba setup to load printers. I'm having 2 problems: 1) if I add a new printer to CUPS (which in turn adds it to /etc/printcap) it doesn't show up in Samba. I've tried to -HUP the smbd process to get the printer to show up and that

I'm trying to add print drivers to printers on a Samba server using a NT4 workstations in the past this has worked. I'm currently running Samba 2.2.7a & CUPS 1.1.17, when I attempt to add drivers to the new printer it crashes the NT4 workstation. Prior to the workstation crashing however it does copy the driver files to the server, it then pauses as if the workstation is waiting