search for: uswc

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "uswc".

Did you mean: usec
2020 May 20
2
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...e this is only a 32bit system I couldn't really test any OpenGL game > that well. > > But for glxgears switching from AGP to PCIe mode seems to result in a > roughly 5% performance drop. > > The surprising reason for this is not the better TLB performance, but > the lack of USWC support for the PCIe GART in radeon. > > > So if anybody wants to get his hands dirty and squeeze a bit more > performance out of the old hardware, porting USWC from amdgpu to radeon > shouldn't be to much of a problem. We do support USWC on radeon, although I think we had separ...
2020 May 22
0
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...m I couldn't really test any OpenGL game >> that well. >> >> But for glxgears switching from AGP to PCIe mode seems to result in a >> roughly 5% performance drop. >> >> The surprising reason for this is not the better TLB performance, but >> the lack of USWC support for the PCIe GART in radeon. >> >> >> So if anybody wants to get his hands dirty and squeeze a bit more >> performance out of the old hardware, porting USWC from amdgpu to radeon >> shouldn't be to much of a problem. > We do support USWC on radeon, altho...
2020 May 13
8
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
Unfortunately AGP is still to widely used as we could just drop support for using its GART. Not using the AGP GART also doesn't mean a loss in functionality since drivers will just fallback to the driver specific PCI GART. For now just deprecate the code and don't enable the AGP GART in TTM even when general AGP support is available. Please comment, Christian.
2020 May 20
0
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...Ie mode perfectly fine. Since this is only a 32bit system I couldn't really test any OpenGL game that well. But for glxgears switching from AGP to PCIe mode seems to result in a roughly 5% performance drop. The surprising reason for this is not the better TLB performance, but the lack of USWC support for the PCIe GART in radeon. So if anybody wants to get his hands dirty and squeeze a bit more performance out of the old hardware, porting USWC from amdgpu to radeon shouldn't be to much of a problem. Summing it up I'm still leaning towards disabling AGP completely by defaul...
2020 May 20
2
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...this is only a 32bit system I couldn't really test any OpenGL game > that well. > > But for glxgears switching from AGP to PCIe mode seems to result in a > roughly 5% performance drop. > > The surprising reason for this is not the better TLB performance, but > the lack of USWC support for the PCIe GART in radeon. I suspect the main reason it's only 5% is that PCIe GART page tables are stored in VRAM, so they don't need to be fetched across the PCIe link (and presumably it has more than one TLB entry as well). The difference is much bigger with native AGP ASICs w...
2020 May 22
0
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...m I couldn't really test any OpenGL game >> that well. >> >> But for glxgears switching from AGP to PCIe mode seems to result in a >> roughly 5% performance drop. >> >> The surprising reason for this is not the better TLB performance, but >> the lack of USWC support for the PCIe GART in radeon. > I suspect the main reason it's only 5% is that PCIe GART page tables are > stored in VRAM, so they don't need to be fetched across the PCIe link > (and presumably it has more than one TLB entry as well). The difference > is much bigger with...
2012 Apr 25
0
AMD Radeon HD 6470M, CoD2 problem
...83]: ..done [ 26.009668] fglrx_pci 0000:01:00.0: irq 56 for MSI/MSI-X [ 26.010357] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1372 [ 26.010532] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1373 [ 26.010615] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1374 [ 26.010736] [fglrx] IRQ 56 Enabled [ 26.178909] [fglrx] Gart USWC size:1216 M. [ 26.178913] [fglrx] Gart cacheable size:482 M. [ 26.178917] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Shared offset:0, size:1000000 [ 26.178919] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:f931000, size:3cf000 [ 26.178921] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:3fff4000, size:c000 [156...
2010 Nov 08
89
Re: DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 on 2.6.37-rc* ?
On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when > > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be > >