search for: usr1_handl

(using samba-2.0.7 on Debian Linux 2.2.15) Hi, I'm wondering how do I get around the problem when you smbmount a share on a win32 machine and that machine reboots, the mount becomes a blackhole. If you attempt an 'ls', 'df' or anything that would access that mount point the program then goes into a state of void and cannot be killed, leaving the proc open until reboot

...ive */ + pstrcpy(remote_machine, "smbmount"); /* sneaky ... */ + setup_logging("mount.smbfs",False); + reopen_logs(); + closed = 1; - dbf = NULL; - close_our_files(c?c->fd:-1); } -#endif - /* Wait for a signal from smbfs ... */ - CatchSignal(SIGUSR1, &usr1_handler); - pause(); -#ifdef SMBFS_DEBUG - DEBUG(2,("mount.smbfs: got signal, getting new socket\n")); -#endif - c = do_connection(service); + /* Wait for a signal from smbfs ... but don't continue + until we actually get a new connection. */ + while (!c) { + CatchS...

...--- smbmount.c.ORIG Thu Nov 11 00:00:00 1999 +++ smbmount.c Tue Jun 13 14:00:23 2000 @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ close_our_files(c?c->fd:-1); } #endif - +failed: /* Wait for a signal from smbfs ... */ CatchSignal(SIGUSR1, &usr1_handler); pause(); @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ DEBUG(2,("mount.smbfs: got signal, getting new socket\n")); #endif c = do_connection(service); + if(c==NULL) goto failed; } smb_umount(mount_point); --------------------------...

..._x86_64.c:490: error: 'segv_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) signal_x86_64.c:492: error: 'abrt_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) signal_x86_64.c:493: error: 'quit_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) signal_x86_64.c:494: error: 'usr1_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) signal_x86_64.c:499: error: 'trap_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/aryeh/wine/dlls/ntdll. *** Error code 1 - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business...