Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "uspici".
Did you mean:
spice
2019 Apr 22
3
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
...e from EPEL. Our
> builds are very similar, except that I compile all the added libraries
> such as libtdb, libtevent, etc. as distinct RPM's as they are
> published by RHEL, just with Pythone 3.6 as well as with Python 2.7
> and with resent enough versions for Samba 4.10.2. I'm uspicious about
> your build and whether it effectively provides full domain controller
> features, which I believe require gnutls 3.4.17.
You can stop believing ;-)
You only need gnutls 3.4.17 if you are using MIT and you shouldn't be
using MIT, it is experimental.
Rowland
2019 Apr 21
2
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
Hi Nico,
Glad to hear you're feeling better.
So now we've got several builds of samba-4.10.x for centos7/rhel7:
- Your 4.10.2 build (requires python36 from EPEL but is more future-proof)
- Sergio's (don't know the details on those).
- My modest builds (based on python2.7 and which don't require addons).
As much as I agree that doing anything python2 these days in pretty much
2019 Apr 22
0
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
...lease. I used the one from EPEL. Our
builds are very similar, except that I compile all the added libraries
such as libtdb, libtevent, etc. as distinct RPM's as they are
published by RHEL, just with Pythone 3.6 as well as with Python 2.7
and with resent enough versions for Samba 4.10.2. I'm uspicious about
your build and whether it effectively provides full domain controller
features, which I believe require gnutls 3.4.17.
> As much as I agree that doing anything python2 these days in pretty much a
> dead end, would there be any interest in joining forces?
Sure, I prefer complete set...
2019 Apr 22
0
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
...; > builds are very similar, except that I compile all the added libraries
> > such as libtdb, libtevent, etc. as distinct RPM's as they are
> > published by RHEL, just with Pythone 3.6 as well as with Python 2.7
> > and with resent enough versions for Samba 4.10.2. I'm uspicious about
> > your build and whether it effectively provides full domain controller
> > features, which I believe require gnutls 3.4.17.
>
> You can stop believing ;-)
>
> You only need gnutls 3.4.17 if you are using MIT and you shouldn't be
> using MIT, it is experi...