search for: using_git_for_samba_development

...a Unix domain member, you do not use ldap in smb.conf If your smb.conf is set up correctly, your active directory users will become Unix users as well. You can if you so wish, go to git-lab and creating a fork and make your changes there, see here for more info: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_Git_for_Samba_Development Rowland

Sorry - I have just seen i did the "diff -u" in wrong order and used my test files. Here once again the correct diff. Am Sa., 10. Nov. 2018 um 08:54 Uhr schrieb Martin Krämer < mk.maddin at gmail.com>: > Hello everyone, > > since I was not able to find any tool like requested previously I did a > "quick and dirty" for samba-tool. > I copied the

I want (or think I do) to use git to be able to grab the latest stable release of samba. I do not plan on making any modifications or contributing code back to samba. Looking at the wiki instructions they seem geared to a developer. Are there any writeups on using git to just grab the latest release ? I don't want to rely on a package maintainer to keep me updated. -- David Bear mobile:

...active directory users > > will become Unix users as well. > > > Indeed it works just fine. > > > You can if you so wish, go to git-lab and creating a fork and make > > your changes there, see here for more info: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_Git_for_Samba_Development > > > > Rowland > > > Thanks for point me there, will take a look. > > Alex If you have, as you have, 'files sss winbind' in the the passwd & group line in nsswitch.conf, means this: First /etc/passwd or /etc/group is searched and if the user or group is f...

No, I'm reading the dlz_bind9.c code. I've found and fixed the problem. It turns out that using a reference counted singleton is a bad idea. The singleton is defunct after reload. If we simply create a new state object and destroy the old one as bind is trying to let us do, things work out fine. This works, at least, for bind9.9. I cant test with the older (9.8), so it is possible that

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:40:46 +0100 Alexander Spannagel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 22.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:35:53 +0100 > > Ralph Böhme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 01:59:15PM +0100, Alexander Spannagel

Hi all, I've got an ongoing battle with samba shipped with Sun Solaris 10 in it's current form (Samba version 3.0.28a) not wanting to talk to my OpenLDAP master correctly. Essentially, under certain conditions, this behaviour is observed, in the log.smbd: [2008/10/11 08:54:03, 1, pid=13610] libsmb/cliconnect.c:(1451) Error connecting to 192.168.117.150 (Connection refused)

<<[Samba] [ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.1 Available for Download.eml>> ********* *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* ********* Michael Adam wrote: > That is right: the link creation in source/bin is fixed, > but the installation of the links is still broken. > > It _is_ fixed in the v3-3-test branch which will be used for > 3.3.0 (scheduled for December). The changes to the Make