search for: using_an_mit_kdc_with_a_stand

On 2017-04-20, 03:35, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > Not windows clients without much pain. In theory Windows can > join a non-AD KDC, but it is incredibly rarely done. Would you mind to give clearer picture how much pain we are talking about here? Any link to somebody who did it? I need to compare it to the pain of another alternatives I have in the table, like let clients mount

...  > compare it to the pain of another alternatives I have in the  > table, like let clients mount files using sshfs. This looks like the instructions: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/2751.kerber os-interoperability-step-by-step-guide-for-windows-server- 2003.aspx#Using_an_MIT_KDC_with_a_Stand- alone_Windows_Server_TwentyOhThree_Client In terms of pain, let me put it this way: You are the first person I can remember asking about this on the Samba lists. Also, you still have to create all the user accounts on each Windows client, you just get to share the passwords. All in all, yo...

On 2017-04-25, 15:40, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > This looks like the instructions: > https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/2751.kerberos-interoperability-step-by-step-guide-for-windows-server-2003.aspx#Using_an_MIT_KDC_with_a_Stand-alone_Windows_Server_TwentyOhThree_Client Thanks Andrew! This is quiet useful info. > Also, you still have to create all the user accounts on each > Windows client, you just get to share the passwords. Noted. > All in all, you start to see why we built Samba's AD DC. You > mi...