Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "usiii".
Did you mean:
siii
2002 Apr 16
2
Multithreading
Hi !
I wonder if the R application is capable of utilizing more than one CPU. I
need to know since we run it on a SunFire 3800 with 8 750 USIII cpu:s and on
a E420R with 4 USII cpu:s and we don't feel like we get the performance we
could expect.
I've seen some old discussions claiming that it isn't.
With kind regards
Lennart Araskoug
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help maili...
2004 Oct 12
1
RSYNC Hangs on large file counts and xinetd
Got a weird one, wondering if anyone has any ideas
Running an RSYNC 2.6.3pre1 server on Solaris 9 (Single USIII CPU, 1 GB
RAM, SAN Disk), client is 2.6.3pre1 on Solaris 8 (Dual USII CPUs, 2 GB
RAM, SAN Disk). In between the two is a Solaris 9 (Single USIIi CPU 1 GB
RAM, Local Disk) system using xinetd to forward traffic from the client
to the server on port 873.
The client is configured to push files by dir...
2005 Jul 03
0
RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 6, Issue 3
...isn't
> worth the power it would take to run it... That's why you see so many of
> them on ebay now - cause no one wants it anymore :-)
I'll differ on this.
We at PARI are currently running two live servers that are UltraSPARC
II-based, in particular, Ultra30's. The specs: USIIi 248MHz, 384MB RAM,
2x4.2GB UW SCSI drives). Is it a barnburner? No. Its performance beats a
400MHz Pentium II with IDE two to one, though, running the same apps I am
using the Ultra30's for. Very usable machines. More usable than the quad
AlphaServer 2100 I have, that's for sure (the A...