search for: ushhid

So where does this leave things regards Eaton and shut down? Has anyone managed graceful shut down from an Eaton unit with either of the ushhid or bcmxcp drivers? Perhaps I should be coming at this from the other end of the stick. What manufactures have the best support in NUT that I can look at and be confident I'm likely to have a successful deployment? Really the only deal breaker for me is graceful shut down communications w...

On Sep 19, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Paul O'Rorke wrote: > So where does this leave things regards Eaton and shut down? Has anyone managed graceful shut down from an Eaton unit with either of the ushhid or bcmxcp drivers? Generally speaking, the UPS will signal when it reaches a low battery state, regardless of whether the UPS publishes runtime statistics, battery percentages, or any other such values. The real difference between a "smart" and "dumb" UPS is not just the prot...

Just looked at your prior mail, and it was using 'usbhid' based on your output. If 'modprobe' exists on your router, what response do you get to 'modprobe usbhid'? - Tim On February 24, 2014 2:56:16 AM CST, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: >Either it is not loaded, or the usb serial and/or hid drivers are not >loaded, which appear to have been used

On Thursday, September 19, 2013 7:16:23 AM Chris Boot wrote: > Eaton actually employs the NUT project lead, Arnaud Quette, so yes it's > safe to say someone is working on NUT and the bcmxcp driver. If that's the case, I'm hopeful that NUT will gain support for these fundamental expectations (mainly battery level/runtime) on Eaton devices, and that I will then be very glad to

On 19/09/13 01:30, Kris Jordan wrote: > Luke-Jr wrote, On 9/18/2013 1:02 PM: >> I wanted to suggest some rating for functionality. I got the UPS >> available >> that seemed to have the best possible rating from NUT's list (Eaton >> Powerware >> UPS 1500), and found out it doesn't support telling me battery level or >> runtime! :/ > > I'm