search for: usermaps

Hi. On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 22:21:28 +0100 Tomasz Chmielewski via rsync wrote: > After upgrading to rsync 3.2.7, the following command hangs forever > (using "--usermap" causes the hang; without "--usermap" it doesn't > hang): > rsync -v -p -e --usermap user:user /etc/services user at remote: This command is incorrect: the -e option needs a command. Without

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 16:14:33 -0700 Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > Not bad but I wanted an ldap version because I was having issues > running ldbsearch as a normal user. > I had another thought, why am I reinventing the wheel, so came up with this: #!/bin/bash echo "#######################################################" echo "#

After upgrading to rsync 3.2.7, the following command hangs forever (using "--usermap" causes the hang; without "--usermap" it doesn't hang): rsync -v -p -e --usermap user:user /etc/services user at remote: It did not hang with rsync 3.2.3. Not sure if it's intended behaviour? The fine manual says that --usermap should be used as a super-user on the receiver, but

Hello! I think there is a small bug in cmdline parsing for option usermap and groupmap. If you give multiple mappings to --usermap or --groupmap, only the first one is used. Example: rsync -a --usermap=userA:userB,userC:userD <src> <dst> -> Only the user mapping for userA to userB is used, the second mapping is ignored. The attached patch fixed the problem for me. Greetings

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10705 Summary: usermap/groupmap do not escape wildcards passed to the remote Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Yesterday evening I upgraded my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE Server from Samba 3.0.22 to 3.0.23. This gave me a LOT of work today... :-( This is what I found so far: My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain. After the upgrade, file based Usermapping didn't work anymore... better: it worked TWICE. (I once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-). So, with LogLevel 3:

Hi listm i ran into some difficulties using samba 3.0.21b as an PDC while mapping e.g. "root" to "administrator" With samba 3.0.10 it worked - however i cannot find anything thats wrong. Can somebody please point me where to look at? Can i test the usermap functionality somehow except for logging in on windows machine as the mapped account? Should "getent passwd"

I have linux machines joined to my AD domain using winbind. I have windows pro machines joined to AD normally I would like it so that when I user writes to an ntfs removable disk That when I mount it on my linux machines it follows the permissions. Is that possible? I use ntfs-3g to mount the partition. I see there is a command ntf3-3g.usermap and wonder if that might work. Is there a command like

Hello, I've done a fair amount of searching, and couldn't find a definitive answer. I am moving my dovecot/postfix servers and mail in Maildir formats to a new host. When I move the Maildir directories, what should I do with the dovecot.index/cache/log/etc. files? I know I can filter them out, and dovecot will recreate them, but is that the best approach? I am thinking of the following:

On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 18:42:36 -0600 Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > I decided to continue trying the ldap route as well > > littlehex2int() > { > hex=$1 > hex_chunk=$(echo ${hex}|cut -c$2-$3) > little=$(echo ${hex_chunk}|awk '{print > substr($0,7,2)substr($0,5,2)substr($0,3,2)substr($0,1,2)}') > echo "ibase=16; ${little}" |

I've been experimenting with the usermap function, and the only problem I've been running into is that multiple domains will be connecting to our samba server. I've been trying to figure out a way to base the usermap on the domain which is attempting to connect, but all I cac come up with is to use IP adresses or Netbios names. Any other ideas? --Jason Coleman

The man page describes options --chown, --usermap, and --groupmap, but these seem to be silently ignored beyond validating that the user and groups do indeed exist. Is the following supposed to work? $ touch a $ rsync --chown=http:http a b $ ls -l a b -rw-r--r-- 1 jed jed 0 Oct 14 02:44 a -rw-r--r-- 1 jed jed 0 Oct 14 02:45 b $ chown http:http b chown: changing ownership of 'b':

On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:40:42 -0300 Ivan Lopez via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi!. I've already read that really useful notebook. Thanks for it. > Sadly, I couldn't find any differences. > > All seems work OK without "username map" but as soon as I map > OURDOM\Administrator to root v?a "username map",? I lost "Sessions"

Hello All, First, I am new to Linux. I am having troubles with NT4 SP3 and samba-1.9.18p5: some NT4 nodes can map Linux and/or Unix drives, some others can't. The errors messages are: - this account is not authorized to login from this station or - incorrect password or unknown username (but I am sure that login/password are ok) I have already check the EnablePlainTextPassword = 1 in the

Forgot to add the list in the TO line! Shane Robinson Chief Administrative Officer SimpeQ Care Inc. t. 604.988.3103 ext. 104 c. 604.506.3311 f. 604.988.3105 Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From: Shane Robinson [mailto:srobinson at simpeq.ca] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:32 PM To: 'Rowland Penny' Subject: RE: [Samba] Domain

I was reading the release notes for 3.0beta1, which says this: 1) When operating as a member of a Windows domain, Samba 2.2 would map any users authenticated by the remote DC to the 'guest account' if a uid could not be obtained via the getpwnam() call. Samba 3.0 rejects the connection as NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE. There is no current work around to re-establish

2015-03-04 21:35 GMT+01:00 Shane Robinson <srobinson at simpeq.ca>: > Hi Davor, > > If the mapping of administrator to root is not ideal, I do like the idea of > having a specific FileShareAdmin group. > > But, why chown and not simply chgrp? > If you consider 'root' as a BUILTIN\Administrator equivivalent it might work changing both Share and DACL "the

Ok Please post the link for the bug report.. Thanks... ----- Original meddelelse ----- Fra: "Rowland penny" <rpenny at samba.org> Til: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sendt: mandag, 29. februar 2016 16:02:38 Emne: Re: [Samba] Segmentation Fault when trying to set root samba password, IPA as a backend On 29/02/16 14:57, Martin Juhl wrote: > Hi >

Hello Rowland, Oh dear! I do feel rather silly. :/ Thanks so much for your patience! I think I'll clarify the wiki (which does mention this, but only mentions the local administrator). When I read it, it mentions that there will be mapping for non-domain accounts in TDB. I (quite wrongly) assumed that my domain administrator was not included in this, and, therefore, would need a UIDnumber

Hi Davor, If the mapping of administrator to root is not ideal, I do like the idea of having a specific FileShareAdmin group. But, why chown and not simply chgrp? Thanks! Shane Robinson Chief Administrative Officer SimpeQ Care Inc. t. 604.988.3103 ext. 104 c. 604.506.3311 f. 604.988.3105 Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From: