search for: user_mapping

I am trying to upgrade our fully functional Samba domain from v3.0.2 to v3.0.7 or v3.0.8. My question is, do I have to upgrade every server in the domain in order for it to work or should I be able to upgrade one server at a time, test it, and move on to the next server? Or should I upgrade the domain controller first, then upgrade the member servers one at a time? I've tried to upgrade

Hi all, I have a server that has ACL's enabled on it and the groups are set properly from the domain that are applied on top of it for the shared folders. I am running with Mac OS X 10.10.5 on the client side and am having nothing but issues with getting them to respect the ACL's set on the files. The Server Setup is as follows: Domain Server: Debian 7.9 with Samba 4.3.4 Member

I am trying to upgrade our fully functional Samba domain from v3.0.2 to v3.0.7 or v3.0.8. My question is, do I have to upgrade every server in the domain in order for it to work or should I be able to upgrade one server at a time, test it, and move on to the next server? Or should I upgrade the domain controller first, then upgrade the member servers one at a time? I've tried to upgrade

I was able to resolve this issue. Just in case anyone is interested, I HAD to upgrade the PDC FIRST. Then I was able to upgrade the member servers without problems. ********************************************************* I am trying to upgrade our fully functional Samba domain from v3.0.2 to v3.0.7 or v3.0.8. My question is, do I have to upgrade every server in the domain in order for it to

...d on.. ) If you only use the share from windows machines, make your life easy. Add : acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes to the share. And set the correct rights from within windows. If you do use the shares /folders also from within linux. Set UID/GID for all (needed) users/groups. Use the user_mapping in samba to map root to the domain administrator, And/or set user Administrator on the folder now set the correct rights from withing windows. Above can be done on ADDC or member server but there is a big differens. Regarding.. ( more explained ) > sudo ls -l /srv/samba/ > > drwxrw...

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:29:30 -0400 Bob Smith <bobs04475 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > Thank you for the suggested link! > > I followed "Using POSIX ACLs on a Unix domain member" also. Don't ;-) Use Windows acls > "Granting the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege Privilege" > # net rpc rights grant "SAMDOM\Domain Admins"

Hi, I have a very strange issue with samba as an ad member server. log.smbd goes: check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [TSNR]\[Administrator]@[ADMIN] with the new password interface [2015/11/27 19:09:26.196960, 3] ../source3/auth/auth.c:180(auth_check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [TSNR]\[Administrator]@[ADMIN] [2015/11/27 19:09:26.196993, 4]

I have created a [home] share: user at jupiter:~$ sudo ls -l /srv/samba/ total 24 drwxrwxr-x 2 root domain admins 4096 Nov 22 21:38 Demo drwxrwxr-x 2 root domain admins 4096 Nov 15 11:51 Finance drwxrwxr-x+ 2 root domain admins 4096 Nov 25 08:08 home drwxrwxr-x+ 9 root domain admins 4096 Nov 24 21:06 Printer_drivers When i try to set the ACLs in Windows I get "Permission Denied" In

...use the share from windows machines, make your life easy. > Add : acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes to the share. > And set the correct rights from within windows. > > If you do use the shares /folders also from within linux. > Set UID/GID for all (needed) users/groups. > Use the user_mapping in samba to map root to the domain administrator, > And/or set user Administrator on the folder > now set the correct rights from withing windows. > > Above can be done on ADDC or member server but there is a big differens. > > Regarding.. ( more explained ) >> sudo ls -l /s...

I am having trouble giving the Domain Admin group the 'SeDiskOperatorPrivilege' privilege on a member server. Running 'net rpc rights list accounts -UAdministrator' Results in this: Enter Administrator's password: BUILTIN\Print Operators No privileges assigned BUILTIN\Account Operators No privileges assigned BUILTIN\Backup Operators No privileges assigned BUILTIN\Server

On 02/02/16 20:13, David Thompson wrote: > Hi all, > > > I have a server that has ACL's enabled on it and the groups are set properly from the domain that are applied on top of it for the shared folders. I am running with Mac OS X 10.10.5 on the client side and am having nothing but issues with getting them to respect the ACL's set on the files. > > > The Server Setup

Hi, On Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Profiles path: \\fs\profiles\rprofile On Centos Version 7 Samba Version 4.7.1 ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER [profiles] comment = Users profiles path = /profiles browseable = No read only = No force create mode = 0600 force directory mode = 0700 csc policy = disable store dos attributes = yes

I've reverted my test box fs back to winbindd and taken sssd out of the mix. I'd love some more help on this as its now faring better in testing than sssd with the macs, however I can set the users to be looked up but I'm having issues with having the names of the groups show up. It seems to be working however its now showing the GIDs as opposed to the group names. For instance

This patch replaces the vmap/vunmap's use of raw pointers in GEM object functions with instances of struct dma_buf_map. GEM backends are converted as well. For most GEM backends, this simply change the returned type. GEM VRAM helpers are also updated to indicate whether the returned framebuffer address is in system or I/O memory. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at

This patch replaces the vmap/vunmap's use of raw pointers in GEM object functions with instances of struct dma_buf_map. GEM backends are converted as well. For most of them, this simply changes the returned type. TTM-based drivers now return information about the location of the memory, either system or I/O memory. GEM VRAM helpers and qxl now use ttm_bo_vmap() et al. Amdgpu, nouveau and

Am 15.10.20 um 14:38 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: > This patch replaces the vmap/vunmap's use of raw pointers in GEM object > functions with instances of struct dma_buf_map. GEM backends are > converted as well. For most of them, this simply changes the returned type. > > TTM-based drivers now return information about the location of the memory, > either system or I/O memory.

DRM's fbdev console uses regular load and store operations to update framebuffer memory. The bochs driver on sparc64 requires the use of I/O-specific load and store operations. We have a workaround, but need a long-term solution to the problem. This patchset changes GEM's vmap/vunmap interfaces to forward pointers of type struct dma_buf_map and updates the generic fbdev emulation to use

DRM's fbdev console uses regular load and store operations to update framebuffer memory. The bochs driver on sparc64 requires the use of I/O-specific load and store operations. We have a workaround, but need a long-term solution to the problem. This patchset changes GEM's vmap/vunmap interfaces to forward pointers of type struct dma_buf_map and updates the generic fbdev emulation to use

DRM's fbdev console uses regular load and store operations to update framebuffer memory. The bochs driver on sparc64 requires the use of I/O-specific load and store operations. We have a workaround, but need a long-term solution to the problem. This patchset changes GEM's vmap/vunmap interfaces to forward pointers of type struct dma_buf_map and updates the generic fbdev emulation to use

DRM's fbdev console uses regular load and store operations to update framebuffer memory. The bochs driver on sparc64 requires the use of I/O-specific load and store operations. We have a workaround, but need a long-term solution to the problem. This patchset changes GEM's vmap/vunmap interfaces to forward pointers of type struct dma_buf_map and updates the generic fbdev emulation to use