search for: user_functionality

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "user_functionality".

2023 Jun 06
5
Trying to build Samba from source on RHEL 8
Hi, I'm trying to build Samba from source on a RHEL version 8 server. I installed all the necessary packages and untarred the source for Samba version 4.6.10. In the past I have been able to successfully build and install Samba version 4.13.17 on a RHEL version 7 server with Python2. Here I believe I am using Python3, but I cannot seem to get past the configure command: [root at v2ecsqapp09
2023 Jun 06
1
Trying to build Samba from source on RHEL 8
Hi, In case you might be interested in the src.rpms with the AD part (might save you some time), there are a few (maintained) sources around: http://samba.tranquil.it/centos8/samba-4.16.10-srcrpm http://vince.cojot.name/dist/samba/samba-4.16.10/RHEL8/SRPMS/ Due to the dependencies, if you want to keep your RHEL systems clean, it's actually some work if you want to avoid replacing system
2023 Jun 07
1
Trying to build Samba from source on RHEL 8
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 17:29 +0000, Flynn, Garrett S RTX via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build Samba from source on a RHEL version 8 server. I installed all the necessary packages and untarred the source for Samba version 4.6.10. > In the past I have been able to successfully build and install Samba version 4.13.17 on a RHEL version 7 server with Python2. > Here I
2023 Jan 18
1
Building samba 4.17.4 on CentOS7
I don't think you are going to have much luck getting 4.17 working on CentOS 7. We recently moved from CentOS 7 (4.13) to Rocky Linux 8 (4.16) and the install process was much easier. On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:03 PM Greg Dickie via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok now, but did 4.10.16? I was just trying to rebuild their source RPM. > > Trying 4.17 on the command
2023 Jan 18
2
Building samba 4.17.4 on CentOS7
Ok now, but did 4.10.16? I was just trying to rebuild their source RPM. Trying 4.17 on the command line (with python3) gives me: > [root at srvlxfs2 samba-4.17.4]# ./configure > Setting top to : > /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.17.4 > Setting out to : > /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.17.4/bin > Checking for 'gcc' (C
2006 Mar 11
0
Cleaning out wine for bricscad afresh
...Other things to consider for later are re-installing cx-office for the like of msproject2003. This doesn't have priority at this point, but I mention it because in an earlier version of wine I have had BrisCAD up and running ok only to see it fall over upon installing cx. -- Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always! Regards SnapafunFrank Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve. Registered Linux User # 324213 [ http://counter.li.org/ ]
2005 Oct 18
0
Re-installing
...- reinstall PlanBee anyway to test for the bug.) Q. I take it that I will lose all associations with these secondary installations by going for the clean installation so ask if there is a compatable alternative that will still ensure I get helpful info for the bug list ? * -- Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always! Regards SnapafunFrank Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve. Registered Linux User # 324213 [ http://counter.li.org/ ]
2005 Oct 16
2
PlanBee
...WndProc EM_LIMITTEXT: stub fixme:richedit:RichEditANSIWndProc EM_EXLIMITTEXT: stub [frank@snapafun PlanBee]$ This is identical when attempting the same as " su " Using : wine-20050830-mdk Mandriva2005LE 2.6.11-6mdk crossover-standard-4.2-1 Any suggestions anyone ? -- Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always! Regards SnapafunFrank Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve. Registered Linux User # 324213 [ http://counter.li.org/ ]
2023 Jan 18
1
Building samba 4.17.4 on CentOS7
On 18/01/2023 15:16, Greg Dickie wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > ? Thanks for the reply. I was not aware of that page but that's super > helpful. Unfortunately it does not fix my problem. I think I'm missing > something basic. At this point I'm just trying to rebuild the centos7 > srpm. See the attached error message (configure? fails). > > The attachment