search for: user9

...g distance calls, but errors out if the call has a 1 in front and the call is local. As a result, users are complaining that they are constantly having to redial with or without the 1. I've tracked down this behavior when a call fails: -- Executing [5551515121 at internal:1] Set("SIP/user9-b696fb58", "GROUP(default)=dialpool") in new stack -- Executing [5551515121 at internal:2] GotoIf("SIP/user9-b696fb58", "1?5") in new stack -- Goto (internal,5551515121,5) -- Executing [5551515121 at internal:5] Set("SIP/user9-b696fb58", &quo...

...rom 0.99.9-test4) by attempting to simulate the execution environment and simply running the pop3 program. Running the older pop3 from 0.99.8.1 works fine, repeatedly: % /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3 quit +OK Logging out. However running the new one: % /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3.new pop3(user9): Error: Corrupted index file /users/48/user9/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index: index.next_uid (4539) > uidlist.next_uid (4000) Segmentation fault (core dumped) It doesn't always dump core even with this message. The error message is not always the same, but it's usually what's above....

...user1 [2004/08/17 14:09:33, 1] utils/net_rpc_samsync.c:fetch_account_info(434) fetch_account: Running the command `/usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m "user1"' gave 0 Could not create posix account info for 'user1' Creating account: user2 . . . . . Creating account: user9 [2004/08/17 14:09:38, 1] utils/net_rpc_samsync.c:fetch_account_info(434) fetch_account: Running the command `/usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m "user9"' gave 0 Could not create posix account info for 'user9' Creating account: red$ [2004/08/17 14:09:38, 1] utils/net_rpc_...

...  470055        DOM\domain-user   4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan  4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 DOM\user7        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 drwx------   2          95092        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jul 1  2015 user8 drwx------  3 DOM\user9         DOM\domain-user   4096 Jun  8 2015 user9 .... drwx------  7 DOM\user200    DOM\domain-user   4096 Nov  6  2012 user200 > wbinfo --uid-info=133265 failed to call wbcGetpwuid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for uid 133265 > wbinfo -i DOM\\user4 DOM\user4:*:133265:1051...

...096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >>        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan  4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 >> DOM\user7        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 >> drwx------   2          95092        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jul 1 >> 2015 user8 drwx------  3 DOM\user9         DOM\domain-user   4096 >> Jun  8 2015 user9 .... >> drwx------  7 DOM\user200    DOM\domain-user   4096 Nov  6  2012 >> user200 >> >> > wbinfo --uid-info=133265 >> failed to call wbcGetpwuid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND >> Could not get info for...

...ther individuals. Everyone else doesn't get access to the share. My smb.conf entry for the share is below [soldrequest] comment = Soldrequest polling share path = /soldrequest read only = yes guest ok = no valid users = user1,user2,user3,user4,user5,user6,user7,user8 write list = user9 force user = test force create mode = 744 I am running 2.0.4b on a Solaris 2.6 platform. I am running Samba on the Sun machine in security=DOMAIN mode. I am successfully a part of the NT domain, and the users that are listed on the "valid users" line can browse the share just f...

I had our production systems running on rc23, however we ran into problems when the server was under heavy load. Eventually, the server would begin to freeze all imap connection after authentication (according to the logs). A user would connect, authentication would succeed, and then the connection would sit until timing out. No error logs were produced. Upgrading to rc24 did not

...M\domain-user   4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan  4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 > DOM\user7        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 > drwx------   2          95092        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jul 1 > 2015 user8 drwx------  3 DOM\user9         DOM\domain-user   4096 > Jun  8 2015 user9 .... > drwx------  7 DOM\user200    DOM\domain-user   4096 Nov  6  2012 > user200 > > > wbinfo --uid-info=133265 > failed to call wbcGetpwuid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND > Could not get info for uid 133265 > > >...

...gate.co.uk:5060/se2489 register => user2:password2 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/se1268 register => user3:password3 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/se0845 register => user4:password4 at callcentric.com:5060/se1777 register => user5:password5 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/se4130 register => user9:password9 at sip.vohippo.com:5060/se1413 ; SJ registrations register => user6:password6 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/sj0151 register => user7:password7 at callcentric.com:5060/sj1777 register => user8:password8 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/sj0203 I then have a selection of #included fi...

...user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >>> DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 >>> DOM\user7 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 >>> drwx------ 2 95092 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jul 1 >>> 2015 user8 drwx------ 3 DOM\user9 DOM\domain-user 4096 >>> Jun 8 2015 user9 .... >>> drwx------ 7 DOM\user200 DOM\domain-user 4096 Nov 6 2012 >>> user200 >>> >>> > wbinfo --uid-info=133265 >>> failed to call wbcGetpwuid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND >>...

In migrating to Samba on FreeBSD from Win(yuck)NT, I?ve run into this hitch. Let us say I have 9 users named User1, User2, User3, ? User9 User1 is a member of group wheel User2 & User3 have the administrative task (add/change/delete) of managing the content of the directory Dirc1 and all subordinate objects (files and directories). Dirc1 is the directory /usr/Shared/Dirc1. Only User1 will need to delete Dirc1, but if it helps...

...users are not happy with that 'solution'. Looking at the workstation log file there are no obvious errors. The only thing that is a bit odd are lines like ths: > [2011/12/15 14:18:04.263224, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:572(init_sam_from_ldap) > init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: user9 > [2011/12/15 14:19:18.083636, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:572(init_sam_from_ldap) > init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: user3 > .... > Where 'user3' and 'user9' are NOT the username I'm really logged in with (and it's not limited to just those two users). L...

...12 DOM\user6 >>>> DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 >>>> DOM\user7 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 >>>> drwx------ 2 95092 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jul 1 >>>> 2015 user8 drwx------ 3 DOM\user9 DOM\domain-user 4096 >>>> Jun 8 2015 user9 .... >>>> drwx------ 7 DOM\user200 DOM\domain-user 4096 Nov 6 2012 >>>> user200 >>>> >>>> > wbinfo --uid-info=133265 >>>> failed to call wbcGetpwuid: WBC_ERR_...

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

In migrating to Samba on FreeBSD from WinNT, I've run into this hitch. Let us say I have 9 users named User1, User2, User3, ? User9 User1 is a member of group wheel User2 & User3 have the administrative task (add/change/delete) of managing the content of the directory Dirc1 and all subordinate objects (files and directories). Dirc1 is the directory /usr/Shared/Dirc1. Only User1 will need to delete Dirc1, but if it hel...

I recently upgradeded dovecot on one of our servers from version 1.0.10 to version 1.1.3. Ever since, we've been seeing occasional errors similar to this sequence (with the username and IP addresses elided): Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3-login: Login: [4954], XXXX, NNN.NNN.NN.NNN Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: wrapper[5006]: pop3, XXXX, NNN.NNN.NN.NNN Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor

...x,userx [string3] path = /string3 read only = Yes write list = user3,user4,user5 create mask = 0760 force create mode = 0760 [home] path = /path/home read only = No [string4] path = /path read only = Yes write list = user9,user10,user11 [string5] revalidate = yes browseable = no writeable = yes valid users = @string5, at string6, at string7 path = /path/path [string11] path = /path/path2/path3 writeable = yes valid users = @string9,string9 brow...

I am trying to configure a VegaStream 50 FXO to work with asterisk. The problem that I am having is that the VegaStream does not support incoming registration from asterisk. VegaStream only allows outbound registration. My question is does asterisk allow incoming registration from an FXO? If yes how? Or better yet, has anybody been able to make the VegaStream FXO work with asterisk? According