search for: user7

Something strange here. User created using: root at dc1:~# samba-tool user add user7 Abcd1234 --uid-number=1007 --home-directory=/home/user7 --login-shell=/bin/bash User 'user7' created successfully I can see the homeDirectory attribute in the entry. But the home directory that winbind returns is just the template one: root at adclient:~# getent passwd user7 user7:*:100...

...%08Xu%08Xv auth default: passdb: driver: passwd-file args: /etc/dovecot/passwd userdb: driver: passwd-file args: /etc/dovecot/passwd and /etc/dovecot/passwd looks like this: anmeyer at anup.de:{PLAIN}password:5000:5000::/var/spool/vhosts/anup.de/anmeyer::userdb_mail=maildir:~/ user7 at anup.de:{PLAIN}password7:5000:5000::/var/spool/vhosts/anup.de/user7::userdb_mail=mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/spool/vhosts/anup.de/%u The mbox of user7 already exists. Can someone help to get both variants working so that dovecot can handle IMAP and POP3 accounts? Kind regards -- Andreas Meyer A ma...

...user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7        470055        DOM\domain-user   4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan  4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 DOM\user7        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 drwx------   2          95092        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jul 1  2015 user8 drwx------  3 DOM\user9         DOM\domain-user   4096 Jun  8 2015 user9 .... drwx------  7 DOM\user200    DOM\domain-user   4096 Nov  6  2012 user200 > wbinfo --uid...

...an >> 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user >> 4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7        470055 >> DOM\domain-user   4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >>        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan  4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 >> DOM\user7        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 >> drwx------   2          95092        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jul 1 >> 2015 user8 drwx------  3 DOM\user9         DOM\domain-user   4096 >> Jun  8 2015 user9 .... >> drwx------  7 DOM\user200    DOM\domain-user   4096 Nov  6 ...

...ore than four users. As a test, I added users "user0" to "user99". Then I ran the following snippet: tc::Admin.configure_group( :group_name => "group0", :description => "Test group - delete this group", :local? => true, :users => %w/user7 user1 user2 user99 user0/ ) This fails. However, if I reduce the number of users to 4 or less, regardless of which users 0 through 99 I use, it works. Dan (me) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?fun...

...IN, rip=::ffff:xx.xx.xx.203, lip=::ffff:xx.xx.xx.1 May 5 09:36:49 mail dovecot: POP3(user5): Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0 May 5 09:36:50 mail dovecot: auth(default): BROKEN NSS IMPLEMENTATION: getpwnam() lookup returned different user than was requested (user6 != user7). May 5 09:36:50 mail dovecot: child 8454 (auth) returned error 89 May 5 09:37:50 mail dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected: Inactivity: user=<user7>, method=PLAIN, rip=::ffff:xx.xx.xx.32, lip=::ffff:xx.xx.xx.1 I run dovecot in CentOS 4.3 using openldap/nss_ldap/nscd The problem get resolve...

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought. I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments and trying to adjust to the new timezone. Some of the more important fixes since RC1: - Fixed several race conditions with

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought. I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments and trying to adjust to the new timezone. Some of the more important fixes since RC1: - Fixed several race conditions with

...\domain-user   4096 Jan > 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user > 4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7        470055 > DOM\domain-user   4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan  4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 > DOM\user7        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 > drwx------   2          95092        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jul 1 > 2015 user8 drwx------  3 DOM\user9         DOM\domain-user   4096 > Jun  8 2015 user9 .... > drwx------  7 DOM\user200    DOM\domain-user   4096 Nov  6  2012 > user2...

...on that file? I used the ext3 filesystem. That's what shred-mailboxes looks like at the moment: shared/shared-box 1 shared/shared-boxes/user/user1.example.com/user2.example.com 1 .example.com/user5.example.com 1 hared/shared-boxes/user/user6.example.com/user4.example.c2442203233424^? 1 ser/user7.example.com/user2.example.com Peer dovecot -n: # 1.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.27.39-0.2-default x86_64 openSUSE 11.1 (x86_64) protocols: imap imaps managesieve ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/old.pem ssl_key_file: /etc...

...8:39 user3 drwx------ 3 133265 DOM\domain-user >>> 4096 Sep 7 2015 user4 drwx------ 7 470055 >>> DOM\domain-user 4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >>> DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 >>> DOM\user7 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 >>> drwx------ 2 95092 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jul 1 >>> 2015 user8 drwx------ 3 DOM\user9 DOM\domain-user 4096 >>> Jun 8 2015 user9 .... >>> drwx------ 7 DOM\user200 DOM\domain-use...

...---- 3 133265 DOM\domain-user >>>> 4096 Sep 7 2015 user4 drwx------ 7 470055 >>>> DOM\domain-user 4096 Apr 30 2013 user5 drwx------ 12 DOM\user6 >>>> DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 4 12:46 user6 drwx------ 51 >>>> DOM\user7 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jan 15 23:01 user7 >>>> drwx------ 2 95092 DOM\domain-user 4096 Jul 1 >>>> 2015 user8 drwx------ 3 DOM\user9 DOM\domain-user 4096 >>>> Jun 8 2015 user9 .... >>>> drwx------ 7 DOM\user200...

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

...t;user99". Then I ran the > following > > snippet: > > > > tc::Admin.configure_group( > > :group_name => "group0", > > :description => "Test group - delete this group", > > :local? => true, > > :users => %w/user7 user1 user2 user99 user0/ > > ) > > > > This fails. However, if I reduce the number of users to 4 or less, > > regardless of which users 0 through 99 I use, it works. > > > > Dan (me) > > I guess the source etc.c at line 843 should be > lgmi =...

..., and read-only for a few other individuals. Everyone else doesn't get access to the share. My smb.conf entry for the share is below [soldrequest] comment = Soldrequest polling share path = /soldrequest read only = yes guest ok = no valid users = user1,user2,user3,user4,user5,user6,user7,user8 write list = user9 force user = test force create mode = 744 I am running 2.0.4b on a Solaris 2.6 platform. I am running Samba on the Sun machine in security=DOMAIN mode. I am successfully a part of the NT domain, and the users that are listed on the "valid users" line...

...2-548) -> -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) -> -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> -1 The "win_xxxxx" groups above are in the /etc/group file as: win_sys_oper:!:5001: win_domain_admin:!:5002:user1,user2,user3,user4 win_administrator:!:5003:user1,user2 win_domain_users:!:5004:user5,user6,user7,user3,user1,usert,user2,user8 win_domain_cntlr:!:5005: Thanks for any assistance/advice that y'all can provide. K Wick, Texas Emp Retirement Syst Phone: 512-867-7325

...register => user4:password4 at callcentric.com:5060/se1777 register => user5:password5 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/se4130 register => user9:password9 at sip.vohippo.com:5060/se1413 ; SJ registrations register => user6:password6 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/sj0151 register => user7:password7 at callcentric.com:5060/sj1777 register => user8:password8 at sipgate.co.uk:5060/sj0203 I then have a selection of #included files. The first defines se2489: [se2489] type=friend insecure=port,invite secret=password1 defaultuser=user1 fromuser=user1 fr...

Hi, Jan 26 17:21:40 doveadm(user7 at domain.ltd): Fatal: connect(ip_server_target:4711) failed: Connection refused Jan 26 17:23:59 doveadm(user3 at domain.ltd): Fatal: connect(ip_server_target:4711) failed: Connection refused Jan 26 17:24:44 doveadm(user5 at domain.ltd): Fatal: connect(ip_server_target:4711) failed: Connection refu...

Rowland, That did it! Thank you so much. I do have a question regarding the 'getent' command before setting up file shares. When I run 'getent group Domain\ Users' I get domain_users:x:10000:user1,user2,user3,user4,user5,user6,user7,user8 Why does it show these specific users? I would assume it would only show my 'tuser'. I don't have uid's set for anyone else. On 1/2/2015 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 02/01/15 17:26, James wrote: >> Rowland, >> >> I did forget to change it. Is...

...land, >> >> That did it! Thank you so much. I do have a question regarding >> the 'getent' command before setting up file shares. When I run >> 'getent group Domain\ Users' I get >> >> domain_users:x:10000:user1,user2,user3,user4,user5,user6,user7,user8 >> >> Why does it show these specific users? I would assume it would only >> show my 'tuser'. I don't have uid's set for anyone else. > > When you run 'getent group Domain\ Users' it gets the groups gidNumber > (10000 in your case) and the...