search for: useplaintext

Hello there, it seems that EPEL only provides mingw cross-compiler packages for aarch64. Aren't there x64_64 ones for CentOS 7, as there were for CentOS 6? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20200227/327dccea/attachment.sig>

Hello, I read here and there that `pass` is available for CentOS 7 through the EPEL repository. In which I cannot find it :-). I see it available for C8 but not C7. Was it removed? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20210616/71e15c07/attachment-0005.sig>

...ps to my eyes looking at /var/log/messages but this, many occurrences: kernel: nf_conntrack: falling back to vmalloc. I searched the Internet for it, and the few results I found were not bringing any solution and were quite pessimistic WRT to memory freeing, am I wrong? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20200629/57b04f28/attachment.sig>

...o use at end-user software but would like to find a CentOS variant/repo where software is recent (sometimes critical for audio devices). Any advice? (1) https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux_for_real_time/7/html-single/tuning_guide/index Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20191008/54c04ad7/attachment-0002.sig>

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 20/09/2019 ? 14:49, Alexander Dalloz a ?crit : > > Please, forget about so call howtos or tutorials on the net. They > > are either dated, giving wrong ideas (no, you don't need a MySQL > > server to run Postfix), failing to explain why the author has done > > things the way he writes them up, or

...install firefox-68.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Examining firefox-68.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm: firefox-68.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 Nothing to do I still can install it using `rpm -i`, but I'm afraid yum-updates will not bring anything later. What an I doing wrong? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20191207/2d758aa0/attachment-0002.sig>

...transaction, re-installed the updates et voila. Since then, I live with a exclude=microcode_ctl-2.1-53.7.el7_7.x86_64 in CentOS-Base.repo file and wonder if I'll give the next update a try.. or not! Anybody w/ similar experience or any thought with regards to this? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20191225/4655039c/attachment.sig>

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 03:39:26PM +0200, wwp wrote: > I read here and there that `pass` is available for CentOS 7 through the > EPEL repository. In which I cannot find it :-). I see it available for > C8 but not C7. Was it removed? This is probably more appropriate for one of the EPEL lists, but: You can see in the epel7 branch for the 'pass' package:

On 15/07/21 4:14 pm, Peter wrote: > Try this installing gcc10-libstdc++ from GhettoForge > (https://ghettoforge.org/) and then set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gcc-10.2.1 Sorry that's http, not https: http://ghettoforge.org/ Peter

...lient 1 connected from local host ( uid=0 gid=0 pid=4552 ) Meanwhile, I restarted the X session (and removed old big logs), but I see the logs growing again. This could happen after a yum-update that day or could be caused by something else. Does anybody have a clue? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20211222/1879f46f/attachment-0004.sig>

Am 02.05.23 um 08:51 schrieb wwp: > Hello, > > after mediainfo packages have been updated from 22.12-3.el7.x86_64 to > 23.03-1.el7.x86_64, I observe reproducible crashes here, mostly by using > it with mkv files. I couldn't find a mirror of the EPEL repository > where 22.12 is still available (only found an old 20.08-1). > > Does anybody reproduces issues w/

...ship support. But it looks like whereas you installed epel-release, it's not enabled. Check if it's enabled in /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo, the [epel] section should have a enabled=1 line (or run `yum install --enablerepo=epel ntfs-3g`) to enable it temporarily). Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20200201/6873d8e9/attachment-0002.sig>

Hi all, This is crazy but I can't see the answer.? In my system crontab I've added a job to stop the music system at 10:59 on the 11th November, and restart it at 11:02 on the 11th November # m??? h??? dom??? mon? dow??? user??? command ? 59? 10???? *???? 11??? *???? root???? /bin/squeezy -all -off >>/var/log/newplaylist 2>&1 ? 02? 11???? *???? 11??? *???? root????

Hi, I tried to install Centos7 x86_64 minimal 1503-01 from an USB flash drive on my old Dell Latitude E6500 laptop. boots up in text mode, switches text resolution, writes: Started Show Plymouth Boot Screen Reached Target Paths Reached Target Basic System. then hangs for some time, eventually starting dracut emergency shell. log says: multipathd: sdb: spurious uevent, path

I should think this is quite a basic question but what I have tried so far hasn't worked. I have centos altarch 7 and I want to mount an ntfs volume. (I am beginning to suspect it is not available for 32 bit so I will need to get the source and compile?) ?These commands I have tried: yum --enablerepo=extras install epel-release yum --enablerepo=extras yum install epel-release I have

On 8/27/21 1:50 PM, wwp wrote: > Hello Greg, > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:06:23 -0700 Greg Bailey <gbailey at lxpro.com> wrote: > >> There's been discussions in the past about updating MATE RPMs in EPEL-7: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436260 >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2019-August/173154.html >> (and lots of

Is it possible to find a repository that hold a newer version of tar. The current version is 1.26 I have some students trying to build Yocto project on my Centos 7 host, but OpenEmbedded reports incompatibility problems with the current version of tar. I thank you on beforehand for any help. |< -- Med venlig hilsen Klaus Kolle Teknikumingeni?r, B.Sc.EE., e-mail : klaus at kolle.dk

Hi everyone, There's been discussions in the past about updating MATE RPMs in EPEL-7: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436260 https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2019-August/173154.html (and lots of others...) As a proof-of-concept, I've written some scripts that clone specific commits from the Fedora master branches, and then runs a tool to re-apply RPM scriptlets

Le 25/08/2019 ? 23:07, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > I have had several people explain to me that my comments were > out-of-place and out-of-turn. When I wrote them originally I thought I > was going from experience of previous releases and thought I was being > matter of fact. In rereading I realized I was crass and grumpy. My > un-reserved apologies for that. I should have

On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote: > Hello lejeczek, > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > >> Hi guys. >> >> I cannot wrap my hear around this: >> >> -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $