Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "usecas".
Did you mean:
usecs
2019 Mar 21
3
RFC: ELF Autolinking
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:06 AM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> Perhaps there's no one clean way to solve this issue, because previously
> all libraries and object files are explicitly given to the linker via a
> command line and the order of files in the command line matters. That
> assumes human intervention to work correctly. Now, the autolinking feature
>
2019 Mar 25
3
RFC: ELF Autolinking
Are you planning to add support for "-F" and "-framework" to ELF linkers?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:51 AM Saleem Abdulrasool via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Sorry for the late chiming in.
>
> Yes, swift does use autolinking, and I would like to use that on all the
> targets. The only target which does not support this functionality
>
2019 Mar 25
2
RFC: ELF Autolinking
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 9:51 PM Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>
wrote:
> Sorry for the late chiming in.
>
> Yes, swift does use autolinking, and I would like to use that on all the
> targets. The only target which does not support this functionality
> currently are ELF based. That said, I think that `#pragma comment(link,
> ...)` is insufficient for my
2019 Mar 26
2
RFC: ELF Autolinking
Thanks Saleem/James.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:15 AM Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>
wrote:
> Yes, I don't think that supporting all options is entirely possible. But,
> there is certainly some allure to it, as it is a really powerful feature
> (which you can tell from the behaviour of link and `.drectve` section).
> The problem with all options is that
2019 Mar 27
4
RFC: ELF Autolinking
...=> add foo.a to the link
#pragma comment(lib, "c:\\foo.a") => add c:\foo.a to the link
.. but there is no existing ELF linker command line option that maps to
this behaviour; so, it is better to have a separate representation. Also,
given that it seems that autolinking is the only usecase currently, the
proposed .autolink section is a simpler (e.g. binary tools can dump the
section without needing special rules), and more efficient (bytes needed to
convey the information) format than .linker-options.
>
>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:47 AM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google...
2019 Mar 19
2
RFC: ELF Autolinking
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:02 PM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:05 PM bd1976 llvm via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:27 PM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:08 AM bd1976 llvm via