search for: usecaes

...D libraries given via the command line > 3. Visit each file in the list as if they were wrapped in --start-group > and --end-group. > > I'd think the above scheme should work reasonably well. What do you think? > Very nice. I agree with your definition of "reasonable" usecaes (actually, as I have said before, I think that restricting autolinking to this "reasonable" set is actually a feature - to avoid developers having source code that only works with a particular linker). I also like the proposal for a GNU implementation - I think this is enough to show tha...

...e in the list as if they were wrapped in --start-group >>> and --end-group. >>> >>> I'd think the above scheme should work reasonably well. What do you >>> think? >>> >> >> Very nice. I agree with your definition of "reasonable" usecaes >> (actually, as I have said before, I think that restricting autolinking to >> this "reasonable" set is actually a feature - to avoid developers having >> source code that only works with a particular linker). I also like the >> proposal for a GNU implementation...

...e in the list as if they were wrapped in --start-group >>> and --end-group. >>> >>> I'd think the above scheme should work reasonably well. What do you >>> think? >>> >> >> Very nice. I agree with your definition of "reasonable" usecaes >> (actually, as I have said before, I think that restricting autolinking to >> this "reasonable" set is actually a feature - to avoid developers having >> source code that only works with a particular linker). I also like the >> proposal for a GNU implementation...

...;> --start-group and --end-group. >>>>> >>>>> I'd think the above scheme should work reasonably well. What do you >>>>> think? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Very nice. I agree with your definition of "reasonable" usecaes >>>> (actually, as I have said before, I think that restricting autolinking to >>>> this "reasonable" set is actually a feature - to avoid developers having >>>> source code that only works with a particular linker). I also like the >>>> pr...

...;>>>> >>>>>>> I'd think the above scheme should work reasonably well. What do you >>>>>>> think? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Very nice. I agree with your definition of "reasonable" usecaes >>>>>> (actually, as I have said before, I think that restricting autolinking to >>>>>> this "reasonable" set is actually a feature - to avoid developers having >>>>>> source code that only works with a particular linker). I also like...

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:02 PM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:05 PM bd1976 llvm via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:27 PM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:08 AM bd1976 llvm via