search for: useabl

> I have tried some CAD packages on wine. In fact, I am a student of > architecture who wants to get a working CAD app on his Linux Laptop. I can't help. But have you looked at qcad? It's a CAD app that runs on Linux. You can find it at www.qcad.org.

Has llvm reached the point that it is useable as a mainstream c++ compiler? Are there benchmarks available comparing generated code to gcc4? My primary interest is scientific-type computing.

...id not give any error and working fine. De Munter Erwin -----Original Message----- From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at mindrot.org] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:56 PM To: Marco Fioretti Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org; marco.fioretti at tiscalinet.it Subject: Re: SSH RPM for Red Hat 6.2 not useable On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marco Fioretti wrote: > Hello, > > I downloaded yesterday the Red Hat 6.2 RPMs for openssl > and openssh from one of the official mirrors. > > I could install them on a stock Red Hat 6.2 box because > > rpm -Uvh says (quoting from memory...): > &gt...

Hey there Gang- The scheduler in the new BackgrounDRb is not really useable yet. So please avoid it for a few days until we get the kinks worked out. Thanks- -- Ezra Zygmuntowicz -- Lead Rails Evangelist -- ez at engineyard.com -- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting -- (866) 518-YARD (9273)

...lso wondering if the official SDK expected for February offers a llvm-gcc as a c/c++ compiler. Which version ? Regards. On 21/01/2008 22:55:30, Chris Lattner (sabre at nondot.org) wrote: > On Jan 21, 2008, at 4:09 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > > > Has llvm reached the point that it is useable as a mainstream c++ > > compiler? > > Yes. LLVM 2.2 will be out in a few weeks, it will be the best release > yet. Many people use llvm to build large C++ code bases. > > > Are there benchmarks available comparing generated code to gcc4? My > > primary interest...

[jimc at harpo boot]$ file pxelinux.* pxelinux.0: data pxelinux.0-3.11: data pxelinux.cfg: directory it would be nice if /usr/bin/file recognized pxelinux.0 as something else, and was a bit more informative; more like these : ldlinux.bin: x86 boot sector, code offset 0x58 ldlinux_bin.c: ASCII C program text ldlinux.bss: x86 boot sector, code offset 0x58 ldlinux.sys:

Hello, On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:51:48PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Looks good to me, do you want to take this with your other kernfs > patches for 3.16-final? Or if you don't have that, I can take it > through my tree, it's your choice, either is fine for me. > > If you want it in your tree, feel free to add: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/attachments/20130818/417d8dec/attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Add missing forward declarations.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 524 bytes Desc: not available URL:

If you pass on something which can be applied to the portablexdr git repo, then I'll apply them. But portablexdr is obsolete for a reason - it's not been worked on for 4 years and needs a maintainer. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network

I believe the 2 patches I sent you can be applied to the trunk On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>wrote: > > If you pass on something which can be applied to the portablexdr git > repo, then I'll apply them. But portablexdr is obsolete for a reason > - it's not been worked on for 4 years and needs a maintainer. > > Rich. >

Hello, On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:51:48PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Looks good to me, do you want to take this with your other kernfs > patches for 3.16-final? Or if you don't have that, I can take it > through my tree, it's your choice, either is fine for me. > > If you want it in your tree, feel free to add: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at

...500GB drives and ZFS make a very large & simple data dump spot on my network for other servers to rsync to daily & use zfs snapshots for some quick backup & if it things worked out start trying to save up towards getting a thumper someday The trouble is it is too slow to really useable. At times it is fast enough to be useable, ~ 13MB/s write. However, this last for only a few minutes. It then just stalls doing nothing. iostat shows 100% blocking for one of the drives in the pool I can however use dd to read or write directly to/from the disks all at the same time with...

Hi all, I was wondering what the feeling was of those on this list as to how stable this alpha is? Is it useable in a production environment for basic file sharing of a shared database (ACT)? The reason I am asking is I am having major file corruption issues with Win2K clients using 2.07, and if the suggestions already made do not fix the problem, I would be willing to try it, if it is (useable, that is)....

Hello, I downloaded yesterday the Red Hat 6.2 RPMs for openssl and openssh from one of the official mirrors. I could install them on a stock Red Hat 6.2 box because rpm -Uvh says (quoting from memory...): cannot install because there is dependency conflict between this rpm (openssh core) and the version of rpm and rpmlib that you are using...... In other words, the rpm packages generated

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:41:03PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > d911d9874801 ("kernfs: make kernfs_notify() trigger inotify events > too") added fsnotify triggering to kernfs_notify() which requires a > sleepable context. There are already existing users of > kernfs_notify() which invoke it from an atomic context and in general > it's silly to require a sleepable context

...ave that would handle the site it it takes off and then I would need to add more hardware and most hosting to RackSpace or something. My question is about initial setup. The 4 x 1TB drives. How to set this up for I have some protection? RAID 0+1? (striped + mirrored) I would end up with 2TB useable space. RAID 5? so what one is a hot spare? 3TB useable space? What about striping the 4 1TB and mirroring that to a 4 x 1tb External drive enclosure? I want to be sure the data is protected, but machine resources and money are limited. Thoughts are appreciated!

The FAQ Section 7 is a very useful place for new users to find out any number of R idiosycracies. However there is no numbering on the FAQ Table of Content or on the Sections Tables of Contents. An R-help list reply of "Read FAQ 7.10" in response to a question about converting a factor to numeric is a bit cryptic. The only time 7.10 appears is after the searcher has found the entry.

...not allowed for TE lib" mean?): best regards and thanks t. asterix asterisk # misdnportinfo Port 1: TE-mode BRI S/T interface line (for phone lines) -> Protocol: DSS1 (Euro ISDN) -> Layer 4 protocol 0x04000001 is detected, but not allowed for TE lib. -> childcnt: 2 * Port NOT useable for PBX (maybe there is already a PBX running?) -------- Port 2: TE-mode BRI S/T interface line (for phone lines) -> Protocol: DSS1 (Euro ISDN) -> Layer 4 protocol 0x04000001 is detected, but not allowed for TE lib. -> childcnt: 2 * Port NOT useable for PBX (maybe there is already a...

...192.168.2.50 Welcome to Elastix ---------------------------------------------------- misdnportinfo Port 1: TE-mode BRI S/T interface line (for phone lines) -> Protocol: DSS1 (Euro ISDN) -> Layer 4 protocol 0x04000001 is detected, but not allowed for TE lib. -> childcnt: 2 * Port NOT useable for PBX (maybe there is already a PBX running?) -------- Port 2: TE-mode BRI S/T interface line (for phone lines) -> Protocol: DSS1 (Euro ISDN) -> Layer 4 protocol 0x04000001 is detected, but not allowed for TE lib. -> childcnt: 2 * Port NOT useable for PBX (maybe there is already a...

Hi, I know that there was a jitter buffer patch (for sip) for the 1.0.9 branch some time agin. At this time, we can not upgrade to 1.4.x. Is there a useable, fairly stable INCOMING sip jitter buffer patch? That is.. I want Asterisk to jitter buffer incoming SIP packets. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070411/7927b860/attachment.htm