Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "us_10130".
2015 Jun 29
2
Windows 10 tech preview build 10130
On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
> I've installed it on a KVM guest on a CentOS 7 host.
I was hoping it wasn't going to come to that. That is, I hope it's not a
CentOS 6 issue.
> I've always had more success using the drivers obtained from running the 
> spice guest tools vs. the virtio-win stuff.  I use:
> 
>
2015 Jun 30
2
Windows 10 tech preview build 10130
On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 18:50 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> I suspect your ISO is corrupted.  Run your sha1sum against it.
> 
> 5EF5A65B474D63BC3DF46CC84D47064B142AA800 
> Windows10_InsiderPreview_x64_EN-US_10130.iso
Damn it, I didn't consider that. I'm assuming you meant sha1sum because
I ran it and sure enough, no match.
I'm downloading it again. Hopefully I have better luck this time.
Thanks for the tip!
-- 
Kanwar R.S. Sandhu
2015 Jun 30
0
Windows 10 tech preview build 10130
...e what for!! WTF.
Hi Ranbir,
I have Son-of-Frankenstein (SOF, or W10) on Scientific Linux 6.6
under KVM.  I am currently on 10130.  And I am downloading 10158.
I suspect your ISO is corrupted.  Run your sha1sum against it.
5EF5A65B474D63BC3DF46CC84D47064B142AA800 
Windows10_InsiderPreview_x64_EN-US_10130.iso
Here is the latest English 64 bit iso:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso-update-1504
Product key: 6P99N-YF42M-TPGBG-9VMJP-YKHCF
And this is my qemu run string, if it helps:
$ ps ax | grep -i [w]10
16031 ?        Sl    29:48 /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -name KVM-W10 -S -M...
2015 Jul 04
0
Windows 10 tech preview build 10130
On 06/30/2015 06:02 AM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 18:50 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> I suspect your ISO is corrupted.  Run your sha1sum against it.
>>
>> 5EF5A65B474D63BC3DF46CC84D47064B142AA800
>> Windows10_InsiderPreview_x64_EN-US_10130.iso
>
> Damn it, I didn't consider that. I'm assuming you meant sha1sum because
> I ran it and sure enough, no match.
>
> I'm downloading it again. Hopefully I have better luck this time.
>
> Thanks for the tip!
>
Did it work?
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...