search for: urrggg

...all instructions before installing. > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of > course, it is required that you uninstall the beta before installing a > newer beta or the release version. Urrggg! I missed this! Can you point me to that? Anyway, on Microsoft side, basically you HAVE to reinstall Windows every 150gg as it starts collapsing ;-))) >> I think you're right that "standardization" on the VC 8 compiler is >> somewhat risky. We should continue the 7.1 eff...

...ling. > > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of > > course, it is required that you uninstall the beta before installing a > > newer beta or the release version. > > Urrggg! I missed this! Can you point me to that? > Anyway, on Microsoft side, basically you HAVE to reinstall Windows > every 150gg as it starts collapsing ;-))) I cannot find any specific instructions for uninstalling the VC++ 2005 Express Edition. There is this README file: http://lab.msdn.micr...

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:18:01 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Again, while I can sympathize, this problem doesn't affect LLVM because > we have no legacy of compiling on Win32. Well, these were reasons why it takes so long for newer versions to catch on. Obviously they don't apply to LLVM. Yet :) > > And don't even think of doing this near the end

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 08:58, Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:39:23 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Yes, in fact I'd be daring enough to suggest that it be the standard. > > We'll have fewer compilation problems with VC++ 2005 because it is > > (supposedly) more standards compliant than previous versions. Please use >