search for: urm

...don't _think_ I'm going back. >> >> Points for the group: >> >> - Samba 4.4.x is broken on FreeBSD. I forget exactly, but it seems to >> be a known problem (tm), so I'll move on. >> > > What is wrong with Samba 4.4.x on FreeBSD ? > Urm... I _think_ it was a build problem. It hit very early on and mailing list traffic from June 2016-ish seem to validate it was a known thing. I don't have an easy place to test as it will refuse to build with 4.3 loaded up. Maybe I'll make a jail after these problems are fixed. > &gt...

I would like to have VMware modules running in the XEN kernel, NOT in DOM0 kernel but outside at the hypervisor level, is that possible? Architecturally, I noticed that xen subbranch does not implement any modules loading. If I were to load the VMware modules directly as an ELF image, will it break any existing architectural feature in XEN? Thanks :-).

Hi there, When I was making examples form "Rolling with Ruby on Rails" ( http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/01/20/rails.html ) , after generating controller MyTest, the WEBrick server ( localhost:3000 ) reported an error: recognation failed /MyTest The WEBrick server was started form correct directory, what else can crush in that way ? Cheers. -- Posted via

Okay, urm, here is the problem :) I have an auto_complete field that gets back a set of three values, so, ideally, I thought I would put the :after tag on the auto_complete_field, use a little custom javascript function that splits it up and flings it into the other values, except, call me stupid, but,...

...(say "vpn1") in the /etc/sysconfig/tinc and the corresponding /etc/tinc/vpn1 directory As for the tinc.service file itself, a good start would be, IMHO: https://leesjohn.wordpress.com/2013/03/13/how-to-automatically-start-tinc-on-fedora-17/ Best regards, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150925/60e665e2/attachment.html>

...going back. > > Points for the group: > > - Samba 4.4.x is broken on FreeBSD. I forget exactly, but > it seems to > be a known problem (tm), so I'll move on. > > > What is wrong with Samba 4.4.x on FreeBSD ? > > > Urm... I _think_ it was a build problem. It hit very early on and > mailing list traffic from June 2016-ish seem to validate it was a > known thing. I don't have an easy place to test as it will refuse to > build with 4.3 loaded up. Maybe I'll make a jail after these problems &g...

...So I thought one may use /etc/sysconfig/tinc instead. Of course, this has the disadvantage of being Red Hat-specific; it would be *great* to have, for that role, a configuration file that resides in a common place, for both Red Hat and Debian families. Best regards, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150925/e5acc85f/attachment.html>

...are "target(s)" can be different than the one used by the > host where the ISOLINUX and/or isohybrid image is being built. > Multiple simultaneous firmware targets are allowed (although this > possibility depends on the variant and version of the isohybrid > program too). Urm. Now you lost me. What exactly is meant with "firmware target" ? BIOS, UEFI, MAC ? > _ Eventually "isohybrid" should be a separate page in the wiki Could be easily done. Currently it is just exposed for discussion. > _ Relevant items for common users: > _ command...

I want to use read.table to input many files, each for a different year. I would like to use the macro variable 't' to refer to the exact file that I would like to input the data using read.table. How could I do this? Thank you! for (t in 1970:2005) { edge <- read.table(file="edge_t.csv", header=T, sep=",") ## I will have many rows of code following the

...just the immediate interfaces which isohybrid needs as input or provides as output. > http://cdrecord.org/ Ah yes. > > If you see particular statements which are surplus under this > > aspect, then we can discuss and eventually throw them out. > IMHO (not a strict list): Urm. That is a list of new topics, not of surplus statements in my proposals. > _ basic general concept, relevant for common user (one paragraph, > something about "image bootable in optical media and USB drives"); I thought to have provided this in my proposal. A motivation in the...

...ot;inject" tinc routes in OSPF and vice-versa? Should the tinc virtual NETWORK interface participate in a Quaga/OSPF process, together with the other physical Ethernet private interfaces? How should /etc/tinc/NETWORK/tinc-up look like in such cases? Thanks a lot, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20151001/c1d5f410/attachment.html>

> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. > > The reference to "above mkisofs command" anticipates the final > position of this text at the end

...provides as output. > > > > http://cdrecord.org/ > > Ah yes. > > > > > If you see particular statements which are surplus under this > > > aspect, then we can discuss and eventually throw them out. > > > IMHO (not a strict list): > > Urm. That is a list of new topics, not of surplus statements in > my proposals. > > > > _ basic general concept, relevant for common user (one paragraph, > > something about "image bootable in optical media and USB drives"); > > I thought to have provided this i...

...be different than the one used by the > > host where the ISOLINUX and/or isohybrid image is being built. > > Multiple simultaneous firmware targets are allowed (although this > > possibility depends on the variant and version of the isohybrid > > program too). > > Urm. Now you lost me. What exactly is meant with "firmware target" ? > BIOS, UEFI, MAC ? A user could be building an image so to be bootable in UEFI systems (too), but he is building such image in a BIOS system. A user could be building an image so to be bootable in x86 systems (too),...

...situation is no better in soon-to-be Fedora 23 (already beta stage, final will be available in October). Please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078237 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261717 Thanks a lot! Best & friendly regards, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150924/c0a1e0d1/attachment.html>

Anybody got any experience using this ( http://greg.rubyfr.net/pub/packages/ruby-xslt/files/README.html ) ? I asked my hosting company (a2hosting.com) about XSLT processors for Rails and mentioned this one. Four hours later I get email that they''ve installed it. Thing is, the documentation didn''t generate, and when I execute ''gem list --local'' it''s

So... I've been running Samba 3.6 for too long and I upgraded. I did save my packages for 3.6, but I don't _think_ I'm going back. Points for the group: - Samba 4.4.x is broken on FreeBSD. I forget exactly, but it seems to be a known problem (tm), so I'll move on. - Whether I use BIND9_DLZ or I use SAMBA_INTERNAL, samba_dnsupdate complains. Strange thing, tho: all

Hi, I want to automate somewhat the addition of created_by/updated_by fields on my models (i.e. to include username). What''s the best/recommended way to do this? Would it be to: a) Find out how to extend the ActiveRecord::Base itself (I haven''t extended a class before yet) b) Use a plugin type approach where you have to add a tag manually to each model file which then

...VEawgAJvmn4083AO94akQPpLfjh901n /gclW2lYxkEgBWspFns3BlM+vQNdAa/585XMSIo+aAfp7Pl3v/1AmrlRzQ/qNIL5AAsBzVGW ZrcsKAMXzVEcAs1mWW4REf4QBf4hBFr7jL251U8kJIz0jA7c8L01EgUk6eI9TTDWEBbvwhub 1olPvMtOUgTpbPkLDlEWt9b2r2MK+gt3BA9yDAQ2UdqHzQcHr1BRFrX8CWgYuAws8cFRp4cb s0q25DtP8S/SHb5tA/0uFO32Qbcay7O9iDD1UDUb8cMxli15/URM/h6YfZG/3fG2cjEQ6RE6 fRwxTLzBCh4V/YwydejcXuLp8qW+WOpuwk3+2HS6DM4/fhVqOwfx6WI71JeNBg/1UqSa9Sf6 Qmxksv6uN/16L7hvbGx4QkUJUNstM5t7XQYx0Q+09YlkewSpHh2wFPnehjf2AEIN/fN33zhG Ouxg2kPGDHeK3U2YhleDO1R0sH0t3G7Hul4vaeU3aX8JIblsjbH5dWMpsu0H9iA8PUfG7hft W7jHdrwvcbP3LAa+aDrG/uZuCr5yBiDdUVbpWv8ZEyN89vANufIPA4ref+k5...

Dear all, we''re currently looking forward to restructure our hardware environment for our datawarehousing product/suite/solution/whatever. We''re currently running the database side on various SF V440''s attached via dual FC to our SAN backend (EMC DMX3) with UFS. The storage system is (obviously in a SAN) shared between many systems. Performance is mediocre in terms