search for: uring

In order to get an OpenOffice configuration that is closer in compatibility with MS Office 2007, I removed the standard OO in 5.4 via yum and installed the latest (3.2.0) from OpenOffice.org. Ran that config for many months without a problem. However, when I allowed the upgrade to 5.5, OO broke. I finally had to remove all traces of OO 3.2.0, and start over. That worked...until yum tells me that

Is length(unique()) what you are looking for? Andy > From: Christoph Lehmann > > Hi I have a question concerning aggregation > > (simple demo code S. below) > > I have the data.frame > > id meas date > 1 a 0.637513747 1 > 2 a 0.187710063 2 > 3 a 0.247098459 2 > 4 a 0.306447690 3 > 5 b 0.407573577 2 > 6 b

On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:32:39AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > FYI we have also this one, but it seems related to > > syzbot+befff0a9536049e7902e at syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > > > Got it, I'll look into it. > It seems

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:44?AM Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > FYI we have also this one, but it seems related to > > syzbot+befff0a9536049e7902e at syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > > > Got it, I'll

Works perfectly. Thank you. -Hugh Rand -----Original Message----- From: Spencer Graves [mailto:spencer.graves at pdf.com] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 6:41 PM To: Rand, Hugh Cc: 'r-help at lists.R-project.org' Subject: Re: [R] trouble with extraction/interpretation of variance structure para meters from a model built using gnls and varConstPower How about this: >

Ne mo?ete pro?itati e-mail? Pro?itajte ga ovdje. ( http://www.chm.hr/index.php?option=com_acymailing&ctrl=archive&task=view&mailid=11&key=3PJdxoTH&subid=276400-g7yNcKB2N6CESr&tmpl=component ) Kolovoz 2015 | www.chm.hr ( http://www.chm.hr ) | Tel.: +385 (0) 95 504 30 74 | Odr?avanje ( http://www.chm.hr/odrzavanje/cjelogodisnje-odrzavanje-objekata ) ?i??enje (

...you have measurements of how much it saves in real world workloads? > I'm asking mostly out of curiosity, not to question the use case. YES?the result is affected by the request size, we can reach 10-40%. The smaller the request size, the lower the result. > > > > What about io_uring zero copy w/ pre-registered buffers. > > > You'll get csum offload, GSO, all the normal perf features. > > > > We tried io-uring, but it was not suitable for our scenario. > > > > Yes, now the AF_XDP does not support the csum offload and GSO. > > This is i...

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: Assertion failed: May 14 07:05:39 sr...

...f the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C > [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 > -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] > -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] > -->/lib > /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: > Assertion f...

...May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < > gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. >> >> Any fix about this issue? >> >> May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C >> [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 >> -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] >> -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] >> -->/lib >> /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-:...

The last few releases of OpenOffice have gotten very unstable on my desktop which is a CentOS 5.5 i386 system. After multiple crashes when doing embedded simple drawings in OpenOffice writer (circles and lines with connections), I started using the versions from Sun then Oracle. I am now using version 3.3: openooffice.org3-3.3.0-9567. I've lived with this but with version 3.x it has gotten

...o Ferreira < >> gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. >>> >>> Any fix about this issue? >>> >>> May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C >>> [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 >>> -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] >>> -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] >>> -->/lib >>> /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4...

...berto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. >>>> >>>> Any fix about this issue? >>>> >>>> May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C >>>> [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 >>>> -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] >>>> -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] >>>> -->/lib >>>> /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+...

...ersion I had previously been using, and I get the equivalent error when trying that too. Back when I installed it, I got no such errors. Note that I am now on the 7.5 version, 7.5 (1804), and when I previously installed 6.0 I was still on the previous release, so I wonder if yum has become broken during the 7.5 run-up. A lot of time had transpired here and I was getting a little warm under the collar, so I tried: rpm -ivh *.rpm which worked just fine. voila! I did this with the older version, but I wanted the newer one, so I did "yum remove libreoffice\* libobasis\*" and it complained...

...t; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. >>>>> >>>>> Any fix about this issue? >>>>> >>>>> May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C >>>>> [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 >>>>> -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] >>>>> -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] >>>>> -->/lib >>>>> /x86_64-linux-gnu/lib...

...t; >>>>>> Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any fix about this issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C >>>>>> [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 >>>>>> -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] >>>>>> -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) >>>>>> [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib >>>>>> /x86_...

Anybody also has this error? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: Assertion failed: May 14 07:05:39 sr...

Dear all, I am implementing a redundant variables F-test. For that I need to compute 2 models, restricted and unrestricted, then extracting the residuals to calculate the test statistic. I borrowed this elegant solution from the LMtest package to rebuild the first of the matrices involved (the unrestricted one) on the basis of model spec. and data >red.var.test<-function(formula,

greetings, i'm trying plot() from Owen's _The R Guide_ and having trouble with being able to view the result. the Graphics Device 2 draws an image i can only see the top part of and when i try to manipulate the window to see the image, the window then says: "...ure margins too lar..." in large letters. i guess it says something about picture margins too large. i'm not sure

Hello, silly question I suppose, but somehow I can't manage to extract the probabilities from a glm.predict() result: > str(res) Named num [1:9] 0.00814 0.01877 0.025 0.02941 0.03563 ... - attr(*, "names")= chr [1:9] "1" "2" "3" "4" ... I got from: # A Gamma example, from McCullagh & Nelder (1989, pp. 300-2) clotting <-