Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "urgll".
2015 Dec 10
2
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Urgll... I took git to get the latest code, and assumed that the
> latest commit there being 6th november, it was the latest code... Is
> there a reason why the master branch is not the trunk? This is really
> surprising for any contributor.
It is a bit unfortunate, but now we're stuck wi...
2015 Dec 10
2
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:15:19AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I did get a bit more than a hundred packets in the queue at 800Mbps. But
> we can reduce to 64, yes. I wouldn't recommend using a static buffer,
> since we'd want to go threaded at some point. Allocating an array on the
> stack is very cheap anyway.
I assumed that one would only get more than 1 packet at a
2015 Dec 10
0
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
Guus Sliepen, on Thu 10 Dec 2015 16:53:14 +0100, wrote:
> Your patch was apparently against 1.0.26,
Urgll... I took git to get the latest code, and assumed that the
latest commit there being 6th november, it was the latest code... Is
there a reason why the master branch is not the trunk? This is really
surprising for any contributor.
> not 1.1pre11 as you said earlier,
My earlier patch was reall...
2015 Dec 10
0
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
Guus Sliepen, on Thu 10 Dec 2015 18:33:09 +0100, wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Urgll... I took git to get the latest code, and assumed that the
> > latest commit there being 6th november, it was the latest code... Is
> > there a reason why the master branch is not the trunk? This is really
> > surprising for any contributor.
>
> It is a bit unfortunate, b...