Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "upstrream".
Did you mean:
upstream
2008 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] Making Sense of ISel DAG Output
...get it to even
accept and generate mostly-correct code for the pattern, I'm going to need a
little help from the tblgen experts to get this final cleanup accomplished.
How should that happen? Does SelectNodeTo need to take care of it?
I plan to contribute these enhancements to tblgen back upstrream as they are
quite useful for doing cool isel stuff. But I gotta get this case to work
first. :)
-Dave
2008 Mar 08
2
pdflatex: fuzzy fonts in Evince, but not on paper output
Hi,
I've been using LaTeX for a few years on Mac OS X, and I'd like to use
it on CentOS now. I installed a complete environment using 'yum
groupinstall "Authoring and Publishing"' and then installing tetex-xdvi,
plus manually installing the 'memoir' class.
I can run 'latex document.tex' ok: the resulting .dvi looks nice in
xdvi. When running
2008 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Making Sense of ISel DAG Output
...his case. If that's not working, it's a bug.
What version of LLVM are you using here? This is code that has changed
substantially over the last few months. And we've fixed a number of
similar-sounding bugs along the way.
>
> I plan to contribute these enhancements to tblgen back upstrream as
> they are
> quite useful for doing cool isel stuff. But I gotta get this case
> to work
> first. :)
:-)
Dan
2008 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] Making Sense of ISel DAG Output
On Fri, October 3, 2008 9:10 am, David Greene wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2008 19:32, Dan Gohman wrote:
>
>> Looking at your dump() output above, it looks like the pre-selection
>> loads have multiple uses, so even though you've managed to match a
>> larger pattern that incorporates them, they still need to exist to
>> satisfy some other users.
>
> Yes,
2008 Oct 03
3
[LLVMdev] Making Sense of ISel DAG Output
On Thursday 02 October 2008 19:32, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Looking at your dump() output above, it looks like the pre-selection
> loads have multiple uses, so even though you've managed to match a
> larger pattern that incorporates them, they still need to exist to
> satisfy some other users.
Yes, I looked at that too. It looks like these other uses end up being
chains to