Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "upsdates".
Did you mean:
updates
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
...t does more work than necessary. I haven't verified this, but I
suppose it's possible that your (or my) coalescer might things something
is legal when SimpleRegisterCoalescing does not, or vice-versa. Have you
thought about the implications of this possibility?
How do you handle dataflow upsdates in your coalescer? JoinCopy does
all that stuff, so I assume you just let that handle it. JoinCopy also
updates some data structures internal to SimpleRegisterCoalescing, so
again, it does more work than necessary.
-Dave
2007 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
Dear Dave, Evan, thank you for answering.
What I did was to remove the implementation of most of the methods of
SimpleRegisterCoalescing and put them in a single class
(RegisterCoalescer_Impl) that is not an analysis. Any class that wants
these methods, can extend this class privately, or can use a reference to
an RegisterCoalescer_Impl object. I wish it would be possible to go even