search for: uprate

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING " (Initialize) tc qdisc del...

...round 300kbits > whereas I reached around 650 kbits without traffic shaping. > Yesterday I played a little with the ceiling value and found that > increasing it to 175kBps did the job. > Could anybody please explain this strange behaviour? > > My shaping script looks as follows: UPRATE="175kbps" P2PRATE="20kbps" PRIORATE1="80kbps" PRIORATE2="50kbps" PRIORATE3="40kbps" PRIORATE4="5kbps" MTU="`/sbin/ifconfig $EXTIF | grep ''MTU'' | awk ''{print $6}'' | sed -e ''s/.*://'...

...ptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp -m ipp2p --bit -j MARK --set-mark 3 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m mark --mark 3 -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A ipp2pPOST -o $DEV -m mark --mark 3 -j CLASSIFY --set-class $P2P TCNG FILE, AND TC CLASSES #define UPLOAD eth1 #define UPRATE 25kBps #define P2P 10kBps dev UPLOAD { egress { class ( <$prio> ) ; class ( <$p2p> ) ; class ( <$interactive> ) /* ACK packets go in this class */ if ip_hl == 0x5 &&...

...ARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A lay7 -o eth1 -m mark --mark 1 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 2:2 iptables -t mangle -A lay7 -m layer7 --l7proto smtp -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A lay7 -o eth1 -m mark --mark 2 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 2:3 ### HTB RULES ### #define UPLOAD eth1 #define UPRATE 25kBps #define P2P 10kBps dev UPLOAD { egress { class ( <$emule> ) ; class ( <$smtp> ) ; class ( <$ssh> ) if tcp_dport == 8080 ; /*Changed port from 22 to 8080 */ class ( <$otro> ) if 1 ; htb () { class ( rate UPRATE, ceil UPRATE ) { $e...

...---------------------------------------------------------------- ### iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j lay7PRE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j lay7POST iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ipp2pPRE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j ipp2pPOST ### TCNG RULES ### #define UPLOAD eth1 #define UPRATE 25kBps #define P2P 10kBps dev UPLOAD { egress { class ( <$smtp> ) ; class ( <$ssh> ) if tcp_dport == 8080 ; class ( <$ack> ) if ip_hl == 0x5 && (ip_len & 0xffc0) &a...

--- On Wed, 05 May 2004 14:01:28 +0100 "Andy Furniss" Wrote: > I forgot to say - if you use DSL tweaking uprate right upto the limit > with bulk traffic may not be a good idea. There are atm overheads and > thay are greater (as %) for small packets eg. htb counts empy ack as 40 > bytes but it''s 106 on wire. If people start gaming (30 small pps up > each) things may fall apart. >...

I have read the thread at http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q1/018287.html and still don''t know how to fix this problem. It appears alot of work has gone into it but the HOWTO is so out of date it doesn''t even begin to addresses this method. So here are my questions 1. what is the current state of these patches? are they in a specific version? do i have to patch myself?

does anyone know a way to shape outgoing/upload traffic per ip? I have a network and i want to limit the upload with 100kbit per user. Ex: 192.168.1.20 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP 192.168.1.21 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP and so on....... Ive tried CBQ and HTB, but couldnt get is right. the only thing that I did in upload bases was: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

...reference energy system 0 0.000 0 0.00 0 2 a indoor temp now 18C was 21C -10 -0.034 0 -0.66 0 3 b far-from-demand ranked-orig-domains 0 0.000 0 0.00 0 4 c ambient air 2C warmer 0 -0.024 0 -0.48 0 5 d uprated building performance 10 -0.089 0 -1.76 0 6 e carbon capture added 190 -1.599 0 20.77 0 7 f nicad storage removed -10 0.000 0 0.00 0 8 g large HV windfarm removed 0 0.003 0 0.06 0 9 h urban domain under &...

I have searched google and came up with too many options and packages that may or may not work for my needs, most articles seem to be for setting up routers. Maybe someone on the list can give me some better insight. I have monitoring turned on my "shift eight (tm)" (Asterisk ;-)) box for all calls. We have over one hundred agents and tons of recordings in wav format. I also

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and

I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM