search for: upnp

...ld still allow UDP hole punching to work). But I digress. So, I'm afraid there's still work to be done to ensure that tinc uses the network in the most efficient way possible for users behind NATs (i.e. "road warriors"). The only way we can try to get through EDM-NATs is by using UPnP-IGD, which tinc could use to explicitly open its UDP port on the NAT. This should pretty much fix the issue with home routers since most of them support UPnP (for example the aforementioned ZTE router does). As a bonus, if we also use UPnP to open the TCP metaconnection port, it could even allow Au...

...harder to maintain). Or we add a dependency on pthreads-win32 on Windows so that we can write the same code on both platforms. It's mostly a matter of taste really. (Personally I'm leaning towards the latter.) I'm not really concerned with communication. In fact I'm pretty sure the UPnP thread wouldn't have to communicate with tinc at all: it's pretty much a fire-and-forget affair. The UPnP code would only need to know which ports to forward, a parameter that can be provided at thread start. Afterwards, the thread would just keep the UPnP mapping alive indefinitely without...

...s.php Are you referring to port restricted NAT in the first graph? Because that should still work with tinc. Symmetric NAT looks like 15% or so, and if you include everything to the right of it, it comes to 35% or so. What is more interesting is the last graph: tinc does UDP hole punching but not UPnP (yet), the difference between the first two bars is about 10%. Not unworthwile. > A Google search for "pf cone nat" returns somewhat depressing results: > apparently it's not even possible to configure pf to act as an > EIM-NAT, and people asking for such an option are basic...

fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> writes: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) > > something like this :P > > https://g...

On 12 November 2015 at 01:15, fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> wrote: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) > > something like this :P > > https://g...

Has anyone successfully got UPnP and Shorewall working together ? If so, has anyone created documentation on how to get it working ? Thanks in advance, Mark

...to be compliant in order for UDP hole punching to work. However, that indeed means that my original post was badly worded - I should have said "50% of *cases*" not "50% of NATs". My bad. > What is more interesting is the last graph: tinc does UDP hole punching > but not UPnP (yet), the difference between the first two bars is about > 10%. Not unworthwile. It is especially worthwhile if you consider that UPnP makes you reachable not only if your NAT is making things difficult, but also if the NAT of *the other side* is making things difficult, too. UPnP is basically...

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > miniupnpc only provides a blocking API, there is no way to > integrate it into an event loop. That pretty much means we will need > to run the UPnP code in a separate thread. Which means using pthreads > on POSIX, and then we would either have a dependency on pthreads-Win32 > on Windows, or we w...

Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: > (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved > simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client > process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very > user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) something like this :P https://github.com/LibreVPN/librevpn/bl...

...Estimated Hours: 0.0 If I send out a packet like (tcpdump output): 16:37:56.642134 IP 192.168.1.25.34699 > 239.255.255.250.ssdp: UDP, length 135 ..^....'.Y8...E..... at ................l..AQM-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1 HOST: 239.255.255.250:1900 MAN: "ssdp:discover" MX: 2 ST: urn:schemas-upnp-org:device:WANConnectionDevice:1 And a unicast response comes back to the same source tuple (UDP, 192.168.1.25.34699)... 16:37:56.645110 IP 192.168.1.1.ssdp > 192.168.1.25.34699: UDP, length 310 .'.Y8.h.t.{...E..R. @. at ............l...>2.HTTP/1.1 200 OK CACHE-CONTROL: max-age=130 DA...

...ceforge.net that seems to be the missing piece... I used the ideas from www.wix.net.nz/LEAF/glibc.html to build a leaf cd using the redhat 7.3 glibc ( It''s alot easier to test applications because I can simply copy the binary ( and the .so) on the bering machine. I managed to compile the upnp sdk and the upnpd daemon and make it run on the leaf.... My question is.. Is there somebody already working on that ? How should I configure shorewall to let upnpd works... I don''t see any packet drop in the log files.. Thanks in advance Etienne Charlier Charlier.Etienne@belgacom.net

Hello, I'm looking for ipPhone and ATA with UPNP and perhaps also STUN auto provisioning via https or . G729 If someone know a good product.. Thanks Laurent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060608/efca9a57/...

I'm trying to run Asset UPnP media server under Wine 1.1.27 on Ubuntu 8.04. The problem is that media clients on the same network don't appear to SSDP discover this media server. The server itself *does* advertise itself fine on the network though (but as this is fairly infrequent, then any clients can be hanging around...

Hi, I hope this hasn't already been discussed to death, but I didn't find the answer through Google. In short, my question is: how can I advertise a Samba server through UPnP/Network Discovery? I'm currently using Samba 3.2.6, but should be able to upgrade if needed. I am trying to build an IPv6-only network, for now just for testing purposes. The problem I am having is that Microsoft no longer supports NetBT on IPv6. Samba itself, of course, works fine over port 4...

...not communicate with symmetric NAT. So in the second graph, it's PAR-SYM and SYM-SYM that don't work, the rest do. > > Of course if there is a lightweight, > > cross-platform library that is easy to integrate we should have a look > > at that. If that can be done with MiniUPnP, go ahead. > > Understood. I'll get busy this week-end :) Great :) > > NAT-PMP (and PCP?) seems interesting to, maybe it is simple enough to > > code directly into tinc? > > Well, the author of miniupnpc also wrote libnatpmp, which apparently > *is* specifically d...

...n interface name appeared in the HOST(S) column of an /etc/shorewall/hosts file entry, a misleading iptables error message resulted. Now the following message is generated: Error: Invalid HOST(S) column contents: <column contents> New Features: 1. Support has been added for UPnP using linux-igd (http://linux-idg.sourceforge.net). UPnP is required by a number of popular applications including MSN IM. WARNING: From a security architecture viewpoint, UPnP is a disaster. It assumes that: 1. All local systems and their users are completely trustworthy. 2. No local s...

...-m tcpmss --mss 1400:1536 -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu COMMIT # Completed on Wed Apr 30 08:32:15 2014 # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12 on Wed Apr 30 08:32:15 2014 *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [1969:200322] :INPUT ACCEPT [1521:108728] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [3534:337479] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [1075:141120] :UPNP - [0:0] -A PREROUTING -j UPNP -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE COMMIT # Completed on Wed Apr 30 08:32:15 2014 # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12 on Wed Apr 30 08:32:15 2014 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :TCP - [0:0] :UDP - [0:0] :UPNP - [0:0] -A INPU...

Hello Tom, I tried the new UPnP support of shorewall, olny to stumble upon a LinuxIGD bug. Specificaly, the UPnP chain is read as UPn from the upnpd.conf . I double checked it, there some bug in the upnpd, it doesn''t process 4 lettered names correctly. Could you change this chains'' name to something a little lon...

Hi people, I want use msn 6.2 audio, and i don´t know. I share my conection with iptables and i don´t block any ports. what happened? thank you ===== Luis GUSTAVO lgpcf@yahoo.com.br +55 (21) 9891-3560 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________________ Yahoo!

Hi Everyone, I use Asterisk for regularPBX use it's made for. But I want to take it a bit further and use it at cmmand level to be able to send SIP notifies to restart a phone or take advantage of a phone's UPnP capabilities. Is Asterisk capable of that? If so, what is a simple SIP reboot message like and how can I invoke it from a Asterisk CLI? If Asterisk is not the best tool for this purpose what is a very simple to implement SIP stack out there that can do this? Thanks, -------------- next part -----...