Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "uplink_dev_a".
Did you mean:
uplink_dev_b
2009 Aug 05
2
bridge vs macvlan performance (was: some veth related issues)
Ben Greear wrote:
> Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have
> to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way
> you'll probably get a big performance hit.
Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a
veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding
performance where
2009 Aug 05
2
bridge vs macvlan performance (was: some veth related issues)
Ben Greear wrote:
> Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have
> to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way
> you'll probably get a big performance hit.
Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a
veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding
performance where