search for: uplifts

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130218/1ef898cb/attachment.pl>

You should not expect pretty much any perf uplifts from any DCE, ever. If it does, it's mostly luck (better cache behavior, etc). You should expect size improvements ;) On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Das, Dibyendu via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What kind of perf. uplifts are expected and in what benchmarks/ap...

Dear R-users, I've been reading a bunch of things on linear models but cannot quite find a clear answer. How can one determine whether a linear model is significant or not? For background info, I am modelling the response of topographic slope to the distance of a catchment's outlet. Some guys have shown that if there is a significant fit to a linear model, one can deduce the dynamic

For unsupervised approaches like BM25 this approach works well but letor does not need special weighting for title in this form as it itself assigns weights to title features separately. But I see your concern it would be a problem when BM25 is used on the index with this setup. Hence its preferable to take a note of this uplift in title weight for xapian-letor and normalize it everywhere

Hi, Am working on neural network. Below is the coding and the output > library (nnet) > uplift.nn<-nnet (PVU~ConsumerValue+Duration+PromoVolShare,y,size=3) # weights: 16 initial value 4068.052704 final value 3434.194253 converged > summary (uplift.nn) a 3-3-1 network with 16 weights options were - b->h1 i1->h1 i2->h1 i3->h1 16.64 6.62 149.93

Hi all, Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my CentOS 6.7 x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore by Google Chrome. "This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this Linux system will no longer be supported." Doing some google searches I found this;

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi, > > We'd need to look precisely at what's causing the code size bloat. The midend commit pointed out by Steve shouldn't cause bloat in and of itself - it should reduce code size. It removes a load of stores and branches. > > I know a backend change I made to ARM isn't

I have a rewrite of the aggressive dead code elimination pass which handles control flow and allows may-be-infinite loops to be removed under optional flag. Chandler suggested rather than a large change a series of small changes and, while that may not get us to small changes easily, there has been no further commentary on the diff: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18762. Given that, I will plan on

> Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 07:18:06 +0000 > From: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> > > Hi all, > > Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my > CentOS 6.7 x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore > by Google Chrome. > > "This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates > because this Linux

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my CentOS 6.7 > x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore by Google Chrome. > > "This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this > Linux system will no longer be

Am 25.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net>: > > >> Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 07:18:06 +0000 >> From: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my >> CentOS 6.7 x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore

On 30.10.2013 12:19, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Hi, > multiboot2 protocol requires some more changes. However, about 80% of code > is ready. In this case Xen and modules are loaded by GRUB2 itself. It means > that all images could be placed on any filesystem recognized by GRUB2. Options > for Xen and modules are passed separately which simplifies command line editing > in boot loader

Le 09/04/2018 ? 03:04, Chris Adams a ?crit?: > It's Open Source - patching to remove such a nag is legal and a service > to the users. > > It's a screensaver program - how many updates does it need anyway? If > it is just updates to add more fancy animations, there is zero reason to > demand people upgrade. Here's the exact response I got from the developer after

Hi Olly, Wouldn't setting the weight of terms in title back to normal (e.g. 5 to 1) by below line, automatically adjust the wdfs and field lengths? indexer.index_text(title, 5, "S"); -> indexer.index_text(title, 1, "S"); if it does not then we should include that part in the patch too. I like to create a patch for xapian-letor for resolving common code of xapian.

Hi there, juliusr at rainforest:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 9.04 \n \l juliusr at rainforest:~$ dpkg -l | grep -i zfs-fuse ii zfs-fuse 0.5.1-1ubuntu5 I have two 320gb sata disks connected to a PCI raid controller: juliusr at rainforest:~$ lspci | grep -i sata 00:08.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3512 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev

Hi, I'm running Dovecot and Thunderbird, with 2 separate accounts (business and personal). One operates fine, but the other one won't allow me to write replies to the Inbox (so that I can track current threads), and if I move emails to another folder, it copies them instead. New emails do appear in the Inbox. I've checked the permissions on the two Inboxes, and they are the same

Hi Everyone, I propose that we remove BBVectorize from trunk. Here's why: - It never made it from "interesting experiment" to "production quality" (it is not part of any in-tree optimization pipeline). - We now have an SLP vectorizer that we do use in production, had have for some time. - BBVectorize otherwise needs refactoring, and the implementation has lots of

>> How do i compile mbuffer for our system, Thanks to Mike Futerko for help with the compile, i now have it installed OK. >> and what syntax to i use to invoke it within the zfs send recv? Still looking for answers to this one? Any example syntax, gotchas etc would be much appreciated. -- Kind regards, Jules free. open. honest. love. kindness. generosity. energy. frenetic.

Status Update on VPlan ---- where we are currently, and what's ahead of us ==========================================================   Goal: ----- Extending Loop Vectorizer (LV) such that it can handle outer loops, via uplifting its infrastructure with VPlan. The goal of this status update is to summarize the progress and the future steps needed.   Background: ----------- This is related to

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:01 PM Adam Nemet via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I will run it on Cyclone/AArch64 next week. > FYI, we're still waiting on these Adam... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170530/7cb390ca/attachment.html>