search for: upheld

...uot;Gruenewald, Laurence, & West (1985)", "Cave et al. (1993)", "Elliot & Knowles (1976)", "Elliot & Knowles (1976)", "Porter (1967)", "Kawaguchi (1975)", "Minnesota Governor’s Commission (1973)", "Youth Opportunities Upheld (1978)", "Maynard (1980)", "Baker & Sadd (1979)", "Goldberg & Johnson (1972)","Roth (1983)","Seckel & Turner (1967)","Zimring (1973)","Randall (1973)","Anderson & Schumacker (1986)","Lattimore,...

...ire aliasing or speculation safety logic. This is Loop::makeInvariant. > All trivial branches discharged. By this I mean both CFGSimplify style elimination of constant branch conditions, but also CVP, KnownBits, and SCEV. (Today, this is often true on entry to a loop pass manager, but is not upheld as passes run.) > To be clear, the above list is aspirational. We definitely don't do all of the above today. :) > > Philip > > On 03/02/2018 04:36 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think we should remove the LoopInstSimplify pass, as it h...

...ng or speculation safety logic.  This is Loop::makeInvariant. * All trivial branches discharged.  By this I mean both CFGSimplify style elimination of constant branch conditions, but also CVP, KnownBits, and SCEV.  (Today, this is often true on entry to a loop pass manager, but is not upheld as passes run.) To be clear, the above list is aspirational.  We definitely don't do all of the above today.  :) Philip On 03/02/2018 04:36 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should remove the LoopInstSimplify pass, as it has no test > coverage and no use...

Hi, I think we should remove the LoopInstSimplify pass, as it has no test coverage and no users (afaik). If you are using the pass, or think that it should stay in tree for some other reason, please let me know. Here's the patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053> vedant -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...Loop::makeInvariant. >> * All trivial branches discharged.  By this I mean both CFGSimplify >> style elimination of constant branch conditions, but also CVP, >> KnownBits, and SCEV.  (Today, this is often true on entry to a >> loop pass manager, but is not upheld as passes run.) >> >> To be clear, the above list is aspirational.  We definitely don't do >> all of the above today.  :) >> >> Philip >> >> On 03/02/2018 04:36 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think we...

On Jun 12, 2014, at 9:41 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 6/12/14, 11:03 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Hanbing Li <hanbing.li at inria.fr> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I know when a pass needs other

Hi, Anyone using my spandsp or unicall software please note that opencall.org is shifting to soft-switch.org. HP have a line of telephony products called Opencall, which were very obscure in 1999, when I registered opencall.org. A search for "opencall" on Google back then returned only references to theatrical agents. opencall.com and opencll.net were theatrical sites. Now a search

hello list , my set up is like this ip device -->ser ---> asterisk(astcc) --> pstn gatewsy my asterisk version is 1.0.2 iam using the ser as registration and asterisk aa the prepaid one with the help of the astcc. now my problem is the destination people i.e the pstn line s are listening low voice and also the blurr sound quality along with the audio of the ip device at

You wrote: > I am writing a news article about the rulings in the cphack and DVD cases > and how they could impact reverse engineering in the United States. > It appears that new interpretations of fair use provisions in copyright law > could force reverse engineering offshore. [We can discuss this in detail in private email, which you may quote freely, but here's an overview

...cise and I think we can make it even better. I still need to document some of this, but want to hold off on doing tons of documentation of guarantees and invariants until I have more things converted over (but not enabled of course) so that I'm more confident that the invariants promised can be upheld. =] Sure, I’m just gently floating some ideas without spending much time understanding how the new design works. The part that seems limiting to me is that a transform has to return a set of invalidated analysis. I supposed that set by default contains all the cached analyses and the transform se...

...v operation times > + * out, the caller is free to destroy their buffer; we don't want the hypervisor > + * continuing to perform reads or writes against that destroyed buffer. > + * > + * This driver does not support concurrent send and recv operations. Mutual > + * exclusion is upheld by the tpm_mutex lock held in tpm-interface.c around the > + * calls to chip->ops->send and chip->ops->recv. > + * > + * The intended hypervisor-side implementation is as follows. > + * > + * while true: > + * await next virtio buffer. > + * expe...

...caller is free to destroy their buffer; we don't want the hypervisor > >> + * continuing to perform reads or writes against that destroyed buffer. > >> + * > >> + * This driver does not support concurrent send and recv operations. Mutual > >> + * exclusion is upheld by the tpm_mutex lock held in tpm-interface.c around the > >> + * calls to chip->ops->send and chip->ops->recv. > >> + * > >> + * The intended hypervisor-side implementation is as follows. > >> + * > >> + * while true: > >> + *...

As I've mentioned on the mailing list a couple of times over the last few months, we've been working on an approach for supporting precise fully relocating garbage collection in LLVM. I am happy to announce that we now have a version of the code available for public view and discussion. https://github.com/AzulSystems/llvm-late-safepoint-placement

Greetings all, I''m forwarding a copy of an email I sent reporting attempted break-ins on my main server, earth.terran.org. I am forwarding this because I think it is relevant that folks watch for this kind of activity in their logs to catch people who "try doorknobs" in the middle of the night. After sending this email, I sent a talk request to the user, who was still logged