search for: upgrading_a_samba_ad_dc

I've been looking at the Sambawiki for notes on upgrading (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC) The way I read it it is suggested to uninstall samba completely and then essentially re-installing. That seems like a Murphy's Law disaster (with my luck) waiting to happen. Is "upgrading "in-place" a realistic option?

On 10/22/20 9:38 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 10/22/20 9:30 AM, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote: >> I've been looking at the Sambawiki for notes on upgrading >> (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC) >> >> The way I read it it is suggested to uninstall samba >> completely and then essentially re-installing.? That seems >> like a Murphy's Law disaster (with my luck) waiting to >> happen. >> >> Is "upgrading "in-place" a realistic opti...

Hi, I want to upgrade samba 4.8.2 to samba 4.10.7. According to here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC#Rejoining_the_upgraded_DC best way is to rejoin the server after the upgrade. But also I need to upgrade the OS, in my case it means a new installation from the OS, because an upgrade is not possible, the old and the new version are to different. Can I do this the same way as described in the sam...

...2/2020 9:40 AM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >> On 10/22/20 9:38 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: >>> On 10/22/20 9:30 AM, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote: >>>> I've been looking at the Sambawiki for notes on upgrading >>>> (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC) >>>> >>>> The way I read it it is suggested to uninstall samba >>>> completely and then essentially re-installing.? That seems >>>> like a Murphy's Law disaster (with my luck) waiting to >>>> happen. >>>> >>>>...

On 26/08/2019 06:06, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 06:54 +0200, gizmo via samba wrote: >> And (re)joining is not recommended ? > We do recommend it: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC > >> There are so many services and computers connected to the samba server, which are not in my hand. >> Means after I upgraded all our 5 ADs I would have to inform many people about the new name and IP. > The identifier that Rowland is worried about in terms of replication >...

And (re)joining is not recommended ? There are so many services and computers connected to the samba server, which are not in my hand. Means after I upgraded all our 5 ADs I would have to inform many people about the new name and IP. Thanks

Hi, I'm making tests to migrate our actual 4.4.5 to a latest versions and add a second dc. I have added a second dc with 4.10.7 and seems to work fine, now I have 4.4.5 with fsmo roles and a second dn with 4.10.7, but reading wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC seems that since latest days some changes about steps to upgrade, now seems that is recommended to us in-place for 4.4.5 ---- Update one Samba AD DC that does not hold any flexible single master operations (FSMO) role, or else the DC with the least roles. For upgrading to a new release, most user...

On 25/08/2019 20:49, gizmo via samba wrote: > Hi, > I want to upgrade samba 4.8.2 to samba 4.10.7. According to here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC#Rejoining_the_upgraded_DC > > best way is to rejoin the server after the upgrade. > But also I need to upgrade the OS, in my case it means a new installation from the OS, > because an upgrade is not possible, the old and the new version are to different. > > Can I do this the same...

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 06:54 +0200, gizmo via samba wrote: > And (re)joining is not recommended ? We do recommend it: ? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC > There are so many services and computers connected to the samba server, which are not in my hand. > Means after I upgraded all our 5 ADs I would have to inform many people about the new name and IP. The identifier that Rowland is worried about in terms of replication behaviour is actually...

...s.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] Upgrading samba and OS - can I rejoin ? On 26/08/2019 06:06, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 06:54 +0200, gizmo via samba wrote: >> And (re)joining is not recommended ? > We do recommend it: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC > >> There are so many services and computers connected to the samba server, which are not in my hand. >> Means after I upgraded all our 5 ADs I would have to inform many people about the new name and IP. > The identifier that Rowland is worried about in terms of replication >...

On 26/08/2019 13:44, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > It is interesting to see two members of the Samba Team disagree. Just because we are on the same team, this doesn't mean we will agree 100% of the time ;-) > Though I really appreciate the support provided by Rowland a lot, I definitely favor Andrew?s "If something isn't being cleaned up then that's a bug". I never

>FYI, I increased samba4 loglevel to 10, re initialized ldb cache et launched again password sync and it failed with the exact same error > >The script used is a python one provided here:

On 10/22/2020 9:40 AM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > On 10/22/20 9:38 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: >> On 10/22/20 9:30 AM, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote: >>> I've been looking at the Sambawiki for notes on upgrading >>> (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC) >>> >>> The way I read it it is suggested to uninstall samba >>> completely and then essentially re-installing.? That seems >>> like a Murphy's Law disaster (with my luck) waiting to >>> happen. >>> >>> Is "upgrading "in-...

Dear all, will it be possible to upgrade/update an existing samba 4.17.10 domain to samba 4.19 ? What are the points to pay attention to!? Greetings Daniel

...> > I'm making tests to migrate our actual 4.4.5 to a latest versions and > add a second dc. > > I have added a second dc with 4.10.7 and seems to work fine, now I > have 4.4.5 with fsmo roles and a second dn with 4.10.7, but reading > wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC seems > that since latest days some changes about steps to upgrade, now seems > that is recommended to us in-place for 4.4.5 > > ---- > Update one Samba AD DC that does not hold any flexible single master > operations (FSMO) role, or else the DC with the least roles. > > For...

On 18/05/2023 09:41, Ricardo Esteves via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for help, probably updating using another host and use join, > or demoting one of my DCs (i have 2, DC1, and DC2) upgrade and then join > the demoted one, and then do the same for the other is the best way. > > But actually last night i was able to do the inplace upgrade > successfully ,

...e docu "Rejoining the upgraded DC" ? > There is nothing mentioned, that a new name is necessary. > Is it because I install a new OS and so I start from scratch ? A new name is not necessary, which is why this requirement is not documented. The page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC was written by Garming and Tim as Samba AD DC developers because this information was not clear in the past. At Catalyst we regularly get our commercial clients asking about the right way to upgrade so Tim and Garming put some time into documenting it for everyone. I'm sorry you get conflict...

...ckages and starting the samba executable. Note that when moving between major Samba releases in general, we recommend that the AD DC is rejoined to the domain. Using this approach avoids the need to explicitly downgrade the database manually. For more details, see: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC SMB1 is disabled by default --------------------------- The defaults of 'client min protocol' and 'server min protocol' have been changed to SMB2_02. This means clients without support for SMB2 or SMB3 are no longer able to connect to smbd (by default). It also means client tool...

...ckages and starting the samba executable. Note that when moving between major Samba releases in general, we recommend that the AD DC is rejoined to the domain. Using this approach avoids the need to explicitly downgrade the database manually. For more details, see: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC SMB1 is disabled by default --------------------------- The defaults of 'client min protocol' and 'server min protocol' have been changed to SMB2_02. This means clients without support for SMB2 or SMB3 are no longer able to connect to smbd (by default). It also means client tool...

...ckages and starting the samba executable. Note that when moving between major Samba releases in general, we recommend that the AD DC is rejoined to the domain. Using this approach avoids the need to explicitly downgrade the database manually. For more details, see: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC SMB1 is disabled by default --------------------------- The defaults of 'client min protocol' and 'server min protocol' have been changed to SMB2_02. This means clients without support for SMB2 or SMB3 are no longer able to connect to smbd (by default). It also means client tool...