search for: upds

On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Henning Brauer <hb-nut at bsws.de> wrote: > We have upd(4) attaching to these devices now. Either nut needs a > driver getting status from upd (trivial, will show up in the > hw.sensors sysctl tree) or we need some way for nut still being able > to talk to the ups directly, without upd and nut interfering with each > other. While a upd(4) driver

Hi, what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? Are such packets inevitably dropped? Does a network card drop them when it does checksum verification in hardware even before the packets go anywhere? In general, if someone were to send me UPD packets with invalid checksums over the internet, how far would such packets get? In particular, how likely it is that SRTP

Hi All, I put my Compaq R3000 UPS on NUT. Every once in a while the battery alarm light turns on, on the front of the UPS. Maybe once every couple of days or so. When that happens I get the following output in /var/log/messages: Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown response to UPDS: .20 MOUL1 Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown response to UPDS: 0119.20 MOIL1 Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown response to UPDS: 0015.57 MOPL1 Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown response to UPDS: 0001.82 MOSL1 Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown respo...

...nning but can not get upssched.conf to work. On the old OS when I pull the power I would see a message in the syslog that a timer was set. On the new system I never see that message. I do get these new messages when I unplug the UPS to test Jan 26 16:51:27 nutpi upscode2[453]: Unknown response to UPDS: DI STLR Jan 26 16:51:27 nutpi upscode2[453]: Unknown response to UPDS: NO STOK Jan 26 16:51:27 nutpi upscode2[453]: Unknown response to UPDS: 11 STBO Jan 26 16:51:27 nutpi upscode2[453]: Unknown response to UPDS: 11 STBL Jan 26 16:51:27 nutpi upscode2[453]: Unknown response to UPDS: 00 STBM Jan 26...

helow my goal is to install via kickstart a CentOS 7 NFS server but I fail to set the firewall rules at installation time. In my kickstart file I set: # Firewall configuration # ssh and NFS # Ports 111 and 875 are for rquotad firewall --enabled --ssh --service=nfs --port=111:tcp,111:upd,875:tcp,875:upd On the installed server,? /root/anaconda-ks.cfg contains: # Firewall configuration firewall

* Henning Brauer <hb-nut at bsws.de> [2014-09-20 13:39]: > * Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> [2014-09-20 01:12]: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Looks like this patch fixed the problem. I see the status change now. > > Good to hear. > > I'm not familiar with the OpenBSD release process. Is

On Sunday, January 26, 2020 3:58:31 PM CET Pete Biggs wrote: > > what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? > > By default I assume they are just dropped - that's what should happen. Hm that's what thought. > > Are such packets inevitably dropped? > > Applications can specifically disable checksum checking for the kernel > network stack

* Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> [2014-09-20 01:12]: > On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like this patch fixed the problem. I see the status change now. > Good to hear. > I'm not familiar with the OpenBSD release process. Is that patch on track to be a part of the final 5.6 release? no, 5.6 is already cut.

> what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? By default I assume they are just dropped - that's what should happen. > > Are such packets inevitably dropped? Applications can specifically disable checksum checking for the kernel network stack on a per application basis, but the default is to check and drop if in error. > Does a network card drop them

First of all - disclaimer - I'm no network specialist, I just read and am interested in it. I may get things wrong!! > > > Both physical interfaces show the same. But does this mean it's on as in "rx- > checksumming: on" or off as in "tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]"? As far as I understand it rx-checksum is the underlying wire checksumming - and from

On 1/26/20 5:44 PM, hw wrote: > On Sunday, January 26, 2020 11:18:36 PM CET Pete Biggs wrote: >> First of all - disclaimer - I'm no network specialist, I just read and >> am interested in it. I may get things wrong!! >> >>> Both physical interfaces show the same. But does this mean it's on as in >>> "rx- checksumming: on" or off as in

I just finished going through the time sync problem, and here's the info I used: To configure ESX 2.5.x Server: http://tinyurl.com/ycpcfv <http://tinyurl.com/ycpcfv> To configure Windows Guest OS: http://tinyurl.com/yctxrr <http://tinyurl.com/yctxrr> To configure CentOS w/o X installed, you still need to install the vmware tools. Edit the vmx file for your guest,

Hello list, I'm using samba 3.x and cannot use newer HP print drivers (UPD). (They always print in black) I updated to samba 4.6.2 with the same problem. My question in the HP forum, did not got an answer: https://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/LaserJet-Printing/Color-printing-not-working/m-p/6073483 My workaround for older HP drivers, was using the "printer defaults" and configuring a

Hi, I'm not sure if it's rsync or Cygwin problem, but most probably both.. Here is a short description: I run rsync daemon on Windows machine (either latest cwRsync or Cygwin versions) and synchronize a Windows directory to Linux server as root: linux# rsync -avH --numeric-ids 10.0.0.1::test /export/test1/ receiving file list ... done created directory /export/test1 ./ 43524353.upd

Hi, I'm trying to get Theora working with a video conferencing application we are developing. This application sends the audio content via RTP over UPD, and as one would expect, there is a draft for how a Theora stream is supposed to be wrapped into an RTP stream. http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/theora/doc/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00.txt The problem is that it is not obvious to me how the raw

Hi, I'm trying to recompile CentOS stock kernel, and after making my choices (make menuconfig), i run "make" and imediatly get this error (after my signature). Yes, i have the kernel source installed :P Any help would be apreciated. Warm regards, M?rio Gamito [root at tux 2.6.9-5.0.3.EL-i686]# make CHK include/linux/version.h SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h ->

On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 20:45, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > > I'm not sure I understand what you are asking. > > It is about VOIP calls via SRTP being interrupted at irregular intervals. The > intervals appear to depend on the time of day: Such phone calls can last for > a duration of about 5--25 minutes during the day to up to 1.5 hours at around > 3am before

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 15:56, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > > For voice, that > > usually means a drop or other ugliness because it is assumed that if > > the quality is too bad, the people would just call each other again. > > That's a funny idea. Phone calls just worked fine and were good quality 25 > years ago, and mostly long before that. I have

Hello!   I estimate vector error correction model (vecm) model. I have only one cointegratio relationship. I write :   joh.vecm.rls <- cajorls(joh.vecm, r=1) The output estimation is : Call: lm(formula = substitute(form1), data = data.mat) Coefficients:                up.d            expl.d        upd.d           r.d      ect1      -1.34e-01   4.55e+02   6.91e+00   2.43e+03 constant 

I have configured support for ice in sip.conf, and made a connection with motif to jingle, but does not work for me [Jul 15 12:03:32] ERROR[21758]: chan_motif.c:1955 jingle_interpret_ice_udp_transport: Received ICE-UDP transport information on session '8b4hdffbt37vg' but ICE support not available -- Executing [s at xmpp-in:1] NoOp("Motif/allan-ce76", " llamada de