search for: update_llc_test

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "update_llc_test".

2018 May 04
0
RFC: Are auto-generated assertions a good practice?
...here is how often we should be using those scripts. Like many test-related issues, it comes down to personal judgement. It is of course easy to create test/CodeGen/*/* tests that pass regardless of whether the compiler breaks broken code regardless of whether the test CHECK lines are generated by update_llc_test.checks.py or not. I find it very helpful to have auto-generated CHECK lines that pick up any codegen change, but this can of course be problematic for very large test cases that are likely to see churn due to scheduling or regallloc changes. Being able to regenerate the CHECK lines and view the di...
2018 May 04
2
RFC: Are auto-generated assertions a good practice?
...be using those scripts. > > Like many test-related issues, it comes down to personal judgement. It > is of course easy to create test/CodeGen/*/* tests that pass > regardless of whether the compiler breaks broken code regardless of > whether the test CHECK lines are generated by > update_llc_test.checks.py or not. > > I find it very helpful to have auto-generated CHECK lines that pick up > any codegen change, but this can of course be problematic for very > large test cases that are likely to see churn due to scheduling or > regallloc changes. Being able to regenerate the CHE...
2018 May 04
2
RFC: Are auto-generated assertions a good practice?
Hello llvm-dev, On a recent code review I was asked to auto-generate assertion checks for my unit test. I wasn't aware that this was even possible. I am referring to the python `update` scripts under `utils` directory. My first reaction was wow! I found it very practical and useful. It saves you significant amount of time when writing a regression test. So I gave it a try. The generated
2018 May 04
0
RFC: Are auto-generated assertions a good practice?
...>> >> Like many test-related issues, it comes down to personal judgement. It >> is of course easy to create test/CodeGen/*/* tests that pass >> regardless of whether the compiler breaks broken code regardless of >> whether the test CHECK lines are generated by >> update_llc_test.checks.py or not. >> >> I find it very helpful to have auto-generated CHECK lines that pick up >> any codegen change, but this can of course be problematic for very >> large test cases that are likely to see churn due to scheduling or >> regallloc changes. Being able t...
2018 May 04
2
RFC: Are auto-generated assertions a good practice?
...; Like many test-related issues, it comes down to personal judgement. It >>> is of course easy to create test/CodeGen/*/* tests that pass >>> regardless of whether the compiler breaks broken code regardless of >>> whether the test CHECK lines are generated by >>> update_llc_test.checks.py or not. >>> >>> I find it very helpful to have auto-generated CHECK lines that pick up >>> any codegen change, but this can of course be problematic for very >>> large test cases that are likely to see churn due to scheduling or >>> regallloc c...
2018 May 04
0
RFC: Are auto-generated assertions a good practice?
...-related issues, it comes down to personal judgement. It >>>> is of course easy to create test/CodeGen/*/* tests that pass >>>> regardless of whether the compiler breaks broken code regardless of >>>> whether the test CHECK lines are generated by >>>> update_llc_test.checks.py or not. >>>> >>>> I find it very helpful to have auto-generated CHECK lines that pick up >>>> any codegen change, but this can of course be problematic for very >>>> large test cases that are likely to see churn due to scheduling or >>...