Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "update_entri".
Did you mean:
update_entry
2007 May 14
0
[PATCH] x86: replace some intpte_t * casts
Don''t cast values when other (type safe) mechanisms are available to achieve
the same effect.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: 2007-05-14/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
===================================================================
--- 2007-05-14.orig/xen/arch/x86/mm.c 2007-05-14 08:40:14.000000000 +0200
+++ 2007-05-14/xen/arch/x86/mm.c 2007-05-14 08:40:20.000000000
2007 May 14
0
[PATCH] x86: ptwr adjustments
Make sure MFN read from pte is valid before accessing the page info structure
associated with it. Drop guest-to-machine-physical translation from ptwr code.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: 2007-05-14/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
===================================================================
--- 2007-05-14.orig/xen/arch/x86/mm.c 2007-05-14 13:43:50.000000000 +0200
+++
2007 Mar 20
62
RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback
Hi Keir:
These two patches remove the need for netloop by performing the
copying in netback and only if it is necessary. The rationale
is that most packets will be processed without delay allowing
them to be freed without copying at all. So instead of copying
every packet destined to dom0 we''ll only copy those that linger
longer than a specified amount of time (currently 0.5s).
As it