search for: update_cc_test_checks

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71565 intends to update llvm/utils/update_cc_test_checks.py to work with Python 2. In the original review, I suggested that we don't add Python 2 compatibility for new features because Python 2.7 is retiring and some Linux distributions are even deprecating/removing Python 2 support. My feeling is: If some utilities do not support Python 2, we shou...

...less they are used in the build/test pipeline > somewhere (i.e. get touched by a fresh check-all). > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:31, Fangrui Song via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D71565 intends to update >> llvm/utils/update_cc_test_checks.py to work with Python 2. >> >> In the original review, I suggested that we don't add Python 2 >> compatibility for new features because Python 2.7 is retiring and some >> Linux distributions are even deprecating/removing Python 2 support. My >> feeling is: >&gt...

...t; somewhere (i.e. get touched by a fresh check-all). >>> >>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:31, Fangrui Song via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D71565 intends to update >>>> llvm/utils/update_cc_test_checks.py to work with Python 2. >>>> >>>> In the original review, I suggested that we don't add Python 2 >>>> compatibility for new features because Python 2.7 is retiring and some >>>> Linux distributions are even deprecating/removing Python 2 support....

[ I am initially copying only a few lists since they seem like the most impacted projects and I didn't want to spam all the mailing lists. Please let me know if other lists should be included. ] I submitted D68230 for review but this is not about that patch per se. The patch allows update_cc_test_checks.py to process tests that should check target asm rather than LLVM IR. We use this facility downstream for our end-to-end tests. It strikes me that it might be useful for upstream to do similar end-to-end testing. Now that the monorepo is about to become the canonical source of truth, we have an...

...all). >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:31, Fangrui Song via llvm-dev < >>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D71565 intends to update >>>>>> llvm/utils/update_cc_test_checks.py to work with Python 2. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the original review, I suggested that we don't add Python 2 >>>>>> compatibility for new features because Python 2.7 is retiring and some >>>>>> Linux distributions are even deprec...

...question, Peter Smith has [summarised the status of Arm LLD support](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-February/121426.html). * Marc-André Laperle [started](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-February/057007.html) a discussion about cquery vs clangd. ## LLVM commits * The `update_cc_test_checks.py` utility has been added, which can be used to update LLVM IR in C/C++ FileCheck test files. [r326591](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL326591). * COPY source forwarding in MachineCopyPropagation has been re-enabled. [r326208](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL326208). * A new `-disable-gisel-legality-check`...

...gt;>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:31, Fangrui Song via llvm-dev < >>>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D71565 intends to update >>>>>>>> llvm/utils/update_cc_test_checks.py to work with Python 2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the original review, I suggested that we don't add Python 2 >>>>>>>> compatibility for new features because Python 2.7 is retiring and >>>>>>>> some &gt...

...ists since they seem like >> the most impacted projects and I didn't want to spam all the mailing >> lists. Please let me know if other lists should be included. ] >> >> I submitted D68230 for review but this is not about that patch per se. >> The patch allows update_cc_test_checks.py to process tests that should >> check target asm rather than LLVM IR. We use this facility downstream >> for our end-to-end tests. It strikes me that it might be useful for >> upstream to do similar end-to-end testing. >> >> Now that the monorepo is about to becom...