search for: update_block

...call looks like this: ################################################################ #I uses remote_function within a select_tag funtion call: remote_function(:update => values_id, :with => "val=+value", :url => {:action => :update_blocks })) ################################################################ There might be a logical explanation to this behaviour but I cant figure it out! Any help is appreciated! /Rick -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...int btrfs_dec_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, + struct extent_buffer *buf, int record_parent) +{ + return __btrfs_mod_ref(trans, root, buf, record_parent, 0); } static int write_one_cache_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, @@ -1224,6 +1346,22 @@ static int update_block_group(struct btr u64 start; u64 end; + /* block accounting for super block */ + old_val = btrfs_super_bytes_used(&info->super_copy); + if (alloc) + old_val += num_bytes; + else + old_val -= num_bytes; + btrfs_set_super_bytes_used(&info->super_copy, old_val); + + /* block accou...