search for: unwriting

Dear List Users Greetings, i have come across the problem where CentOS 6.3 x64 has more than 700 processes running. i am not sure where to start, what in normal or abnormal. [root at jet]# ps -A PID TTY TIME CMD 1 ? 00:00:03 init 2 ? 00:00:00 kthreadd 3 ? 00:00:00 migration/0 4 ? 00:00:00 ksoftirqd/0 5 ? 00:00:00 migration/0 6

Greetings, I would like to see following option in a future release: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- hide unwritable (S) This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files or directories that cannot be write. Defaults to off. Default: hide unwritable = no -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Of

Thank you guys for your reply. I tried but it still does not work On 10/14/2015 5:37 PM, Stéphane PURNELLE wrote: > > These parameters must be put on share section, not in global section > > hide unreadable = yes > hide unwriteable files = yes > example > > [smb_shr1] > path = /mnt/LV002/share1 > read only = no > create mode = 0777

..., function: 'fArg(int)', args: [ 1 ], cpu: {{.*}}, thread: [[THREAD2]], kind: function-enter-arg, tsc: {{[0-9]+}} } // TRACE-DAG: - { type: 0, func-id: [[FIDARG]], function: 'fArg(int)', cpu: {{.*}}, thread: [[THREAD2]], kind: function-exit, tsc: {{[0-9]+}} } // Assert that when unwriting is enabled with a high threshold time, all the function records are erased. A CPU switch could erroneously fail this test, but // is unlikely given the test program. // Even with a high threshold, arg1 logging is never unwritten. // UNWRITE: header: // UNWRITE: records: // UNWRITE-NEXT: - { ty...

Hi, I'm not a member of the list, but I think I've run across a (minor) bug. The rsync web page directed me to this list for bug reports. Anyway, I've described it below (including a simple test case with exact commands to reproduce and the output I get from those commands). I hope this helps. Let me know if any more information is needed. Elijah P.S. If it isn't a bug,

Hi, Try these params to hide files when users doesn't have read/write access to them. hide unreadable (S) This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be read. Defaults to off. Default: *hide unreadable = no* hide unwriteable files (S) This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be written to. Defaults to off. Note that

I need to hide the listing of files to multiple users, but only allow access to the file if you know the exact path and filename of the file in the form of \\server\share\filename.txt. I am using the hide unwriteable files = yes flag to accomplish this and it works as expected with windows 7. However, windows XP gives the error that windows cannot find the file. Is there a different setting, or

Hi all, I want to shows a user only the files that he/she has permission to access. I configured smb.conf like that: [global] workgroup = STORAGE encrypt passwords = yes security = user access based share enum = yes hide unreadable = yes hide unwriteable files = yes [smb_shr1] path = /mnt/LV002/share1 read only = no create mode = 0777

Dear All, I have implemented samba to right now in test environment to be implemented in production as? samba file server so far its working grt but I have one issue i have right now one share and want only the users who have access to the share to see it and the others should not when I log into the user who has no access I see the share and when i double click it ask me for username and

[global] workgroup = NPC server string = Samba Server %v netbios name = Atlantica security = user map to guest = bad user dns proxy = no hide files = /~*/ hide unwriteable files = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%S valid users = %S browseable = no guest ok = no writable = yes

good afternoon everyone, I have a problem that I can not solve I have installed a samba 4.9.0 in centos 7.5 using XFS. In the DPTO share I have the departmental folders, which I gave the rights to the groups. The problem: when a user creates a file within some sub-folders the group's rights do not arrive in the file is read-only. When the user accesses a website and downloads

bash 4.4 installs the (binary) examples of builtins by default: among them, there is one called 'sync', which segfaults when called standalone. Since this test actually looks for the 'sync' utility from coreutils, filter out the bash-specific paths from the search results. --- tests/test-binaries-exist.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

What I have done bevor updating to 4.3.4 and it was working until then. I userd the map unix tab in ADUC and gave uid and gid to all users /groups but administrator. This worked until the update. Now the dcs mix up only!!! group ids with computer ids (security tab) root at s4slave exim]# getent group personal TPLK\personal:x:3000044: root at s4slave exim]# getent group reserve09$

I can''t seem to get the fragment cache to use :file_store. I''d really appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction. Rails 1.1 final, FreeBSD Observe: In environment.rb AND production.rb (for good measure, DRY be damned): ActionController::Base.fragment_cache_store = :file_store, "/www/apps/localfeeds/directory/tmp/fragmentcache/" At the console

>>>>> Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> >>>>> on Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:05:51 +0200 writes: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Martin Maechler > <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> As I've found it is not at all hard to add an option >> which checks the existence and if the directory is no >>

Hi Rowland, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_POSIX_ACLs What do you think about that config for the share FTPFiles ? Does it has some directives you would remove ? [FTPFiles] comment = Files path = /glftpd/site guest ok = no public = no writable = yes printable = no browseable = yes read only = no inherit acls = yes inherit permissions =

Use different directories for the output formats, otherwise any supermin --build call after the first will fail to rename the temporary directory to the designated output directory (as it exists already). Also make sure that we can remove all the files in the chroot output. --- tests/test-build-bash.sh | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

I have something like 300G I routinely backup. This includes some large 12Gig images and other files. I had been using ext3 on an external USB disk for part of the process. Under ext3 doing "rsync -a /home /mnt/external_back/backup.jun.27.2011" it took 200 minutes. I took the same computer, same external HD and reformatted it for ext4 (mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdd1). I then started the same

Hi all. I thying settings the option "hide unreadable" but not work. I tested in global section and share section, follow my settings now. after various tests. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BATLAB realm = BATLAB.CORP netbios name = GAUSS server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl,

Ok, it's taken me a while, but here's what seems to be the problem. In OSX I see a lock on the file. If that lock is ON, it disappears. But what is that lock and where did it come from.... Is it like a read only lock? On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM Curtis Vaughan <cavaughan at gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, here's what seems to be going on. When a JPG is put into a share it >