search for: unviersity

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "unviersity".

Did you mean: university
2007 Aug 08
1
prediction using gam
...tive values). When I plot the predicted surface, it looks well behaved with no strange dips/etc. Could it be a problem with the predict command? Is there a "safe" version of predict for higher-dimensional smoothers in gam? Elizabeth Johnson Research Associate Johns Hopkins Unviersity Department of Biostatistics [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2014 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] lld build needs to have flags that specify what flavor/targets to build ?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote: > This it totally "armchair quarterbacking," but I am a little frustrated > that we've come to conflate flavors and targets. > > The original intent of flavors was to internally translate each flavor > into a neutral lld-native command line syntax. We now have baked in >
2007 Dec 04
0
RSync and large amounts of data
...rks the way it should; but clearly not for about 220G. On the main server rsync takes about 300M - (there are 4 CPUs and 4G) so it's not starved for ram and no users are allowed on the system and it's strictly a Samba and NFS server - lightly loaded. Thankyou, - Eric Praetzel, ECE Dept, Unviersity of Waterloo
2004 Oct 25
1
unable to open connection
...open URL `http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.0/PACKAGES' In addition: Warning message: unable to resolve 'cran.r-project.org'. I use the Window operation system I don't konw what is the matter Thank you Best regards Shizhu Zang Cancer Research Institue Peking Unviersity Beijing CHINA --------------------------------- 150ÍòÇúMP3·è¿ñËÑ£¬´øÄú´³ÈëÒôÀÖµîÌà ÃÀÅ®Ã÷ÐÇÓ¦Óо¡ÓУ¬ËѱéÃÀͼ¡¢ÑÞͼºÍ¿áͼ 1G¾ÍÊÇ1000Õ×£¬ÑÅ»¢µçÓÊ×ÔÖúÀ©ÈÝ£¡ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2014 Oct 07
5
[LLVMdev] [lld] lld build needs to have flags that specify what flavor/targets to build ?
On 10/7/2014 4:10 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > Shankar, > > Can you give provide a scenario where you want this? I’m not sure what you want here. a) LLVM could be built just for one target(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD) b) With LTO this case might happen more often, where an user would have compiled LLVM just for one architecture and lld would support other architectures that LLVM would not