search for: unviersal

I am fitting a two dimensional smoother in gam, say junk = gam(y~s(x1,x2)), to a response variable y that is always positive and pretty well behaved, both x1 and x2 are contained within [0,1]. I then create a new dataset for prediction with values of (x1,x2) within the range of the original data. predict(junk,newdata,type="response") My predicted values are a bit strange

...a LINK.EXE command line flavor from OS X and I'd > rather use an lld-native flavor. > What do we get by making each flavor's driver to a translator to the "universal" lld driver? The merit is not obvious to me, while I'm sure we would have to invent a new syntax for the unviersal driver and maintain the extra layer. Another question is that if we make such universal driver, it will support all the options of all flavors in some way, but what combination of the options are allowed? Some option mapping is obvious; for example --verbose in ld and /verbose in link.exe should b...

-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Eric Praetzel <praetzel@engmail.uwaterloo.ca> To: matt@mattmccutchen.net Subject: RSync and large amounts of data Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:00:39 -0500 (EST) Good day Mr McCutchen, I've posted to the rsync list but nobody replied and you seem knowledgeable. Can you think of any reason why for about 220G of files (about 4.5M files) that rsync

Hi , there: I used function source to download the package but found > source("http://www.bioconductor.org/getBioC.R") Error in file(file, "r") : unable to open connection In addition: Warning message: unable to resolve 'www.bioconductor.org'. Then I downloaded the packages from CRAN and found > local({a <- CRAN.packages() +

On 10/7/2014 4:10 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > Shankar, > > Can you give provide a scenario where you want this? I’m not sure what you want here. a) LLVM could be built just for one target(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD) b) With LTO this case might happen more often, where an user would have compiled LLVM just for one architecture and lld would support other architectures that LLVM would not