Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "unused_lock".
Did you mean:
unused_block
2010 Jul 10
1
deadlock possiblity introduced by "drm/nouveau: use drm_mm in preference to custom code doing the same thing"
...=======
[ 2417.746642] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
[ 2417.746644] 2.6.35-rc4-nv+ #379
[ 2417.746645] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 2417.746648] warsow/2850 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
[ 2417.746650] (&(&mm->unused_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8129f0c0>] drm_mm_put_block+0x17a/0x1c0
[ 2417.746657]
[ 2417.746658] and this task is already holding:
[ 2417.746659] (&(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffffa00ac502>] nouveau_channel_free+0x10f/0x233 [nouvea...
2010 Jul 28
0
mmotm 2010-07-27 - nouveau lockdep issues.
...] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
> [ 123.551253] 2.6.35-rc6-mmotm0727 #1
> [ 123.551253] ------------------------------------------------------
> [ 123.551253] e16/3822 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
> [ 123.551253] (&(&mm->unused_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff812a94bc>] drm_mm_put_block+0x10e/0x142
> [ 123.551253]
> [ 123.551253] and this task is already holding:
> [ 123.551253] (&(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffff812bdbab>] nouveau_channel_free+0x10...