search for: untru

I have an old server box that I've traditionally updated from source. I'd like to switch over to -RELEASE and use freebsd-update in the future. What's the easiest way to achieve that? Will just untarring the relevantrelease distro files work? -- Regards, Mike

...tOS support: http://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23487 Here is a poll that might help them see how many CentOS Customers they REALLY have: http://www.zimbra.com/forums/users/14136-foss-edition-most-popular-linux-distro.html I am not asking for anyone to do anything mean, or to say anything untrue, in fact, please don't. I am asking that if you use Zimbra on CentOS (either the Free Version or the Network Version) that you let them know that you are. If you would pay for Official support, let them know that too. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text...

...There is nothing stopping people from working in branches in svn and merging from branches is easy. The advantage with git is that it's very easy to have your fork somewhere where no one else sees it and your changes get lost and forgotten. Your point about small incremental commits is also untrue. svn encourages small incremental commits and, more importantly, encourages small incremental pushes upstream. This is something we want to encourage: we don't want to make it easier for people to have private forks than it is to push them upstream. David

...know where I can get the latest puppet, 2.7.1 as RPM''s? The spec file that comes with the puppet 2.7.1 source is broken again, and only version 0.25.5 seems to be available via EPEL, which means that the website''s assertion that you can get puppet as an RPM from there is somewhat untrue. Douglas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, v...

...documentation here: https://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions , under Permissions for new mailboxes says this: "When creating a new mailbox, Dovecot copies the permissions from the mailbox root directory. For example with mboxes if you have directories" But it seems to be untrue. I checked it, it soesn't work. I found a topic in mail list archive: https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-September/033395.html Its recommended to create a 'dovecot-shared' file in each mailbox with proper rights. But how can I do that if mailbox is not exists yet ? Can you prov...

On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:55:25PM +0100, Darrell Berry wrote: > so, for ices 0.1.0: > > can't build with versions less than 3.88? > > BUT > > versions about 3.86 don't support reencoding? Are you on crack? :) lame 3.88 works fine. I don't understand what you mean when you say lame doesn't support reencoding? > in which case, veriosn 0.1.0 of ices

...comments in Speex. I believe Speex supports Vorbis Comments. Vorbis Comments should probably be renamed to Ogg Comments, because most if not all Xiph codecs (e.g. FLAC and Theora) use it in some form. God, I hope I'm not wrong about this; lately I have said so much crap that turned out to be untrue.

...), and the developers seem to have a chip on their collective shoulder, and it is too complex. I found dovecot because it is ships with CentOS 4 (ie Red Hat Enterprise 4). It looks like just what I need: simple, fast. But I can't use it! I can't authenticate. If any of these statements were untrue, I would use it happily: o it doesn't support simple bind authentication against LDAP o I don't want to make passwords readable, and this version (0.99.14) doesn't support SSHA anyway o it won't talk to the saslauthd I already have configured o I can't find how to implement a...

When running an executable file (such as a patch for a game), I get an error message saying that the installer couldn't start, and that I may be out of disk space. I'm fairly certain this is untrue. I'm pretty new to Linux. Anybody able to help?

...y the used space, but not the total space: I have set 100 MB soft limit, 200 MB hard limit and one user has used 150 MB, and it shows "150 MB used / 0 bytes free". When the user logs off, Windows complains that it can't store the roaming profile due to lack of disk space, which is untrue and causes some problems like files that the users store and are not there the next day. I guess Samba gets the total space from the soft quota limit and not from the hard quota limit. Is this correct and if so can I change it? Thanks.

...s, as implemented, has an semi-implicit cost model which says that permutations followed by another vector operation are free, scalar -> vector transfers are free, and vectorizing a memory operation is just as good as vectorizing an arithmetic operation. Depending on the system, these may all be untrue (although on some systems they are true). If you can generate a test case that would be great, I'd like to look at it. > > I would like to not stop you from committing the patch just because > of performance issues: let's address any further improvements once > the patch is...

...d on my computers. I don't believe I've ever used it, which is a good thing since I'm not a strict academic! Is there any way to flag packages like this, with restrictive or unusual licenses. I tend to assume that anything on CRAN is GPL and not worry about it, but obviously that's untrue. I'd ask if anyone has completed the form and paid the licensing fee, but I don't want anyone to incriminate themselves. And I believe I'll be deleting the package from my systems. Sarah -- Sarah Goslee http://www.functionaldiversity.org

...as an semi-implicit cost model which says > that permutations followed by another vector operation are free, scalar > -> vector transfers are free, and vectorizing a memory operation is just > as good as vectorizing an arithmetic operation. Depending on the system, > these may all be untrue (although on some systems they are true). > > If you can generate a test case that would be great, I'd like to look at > it. Here is the testcase with calls to gettimeofday to measure time spent in the kernel and not in the ini/fini phases. On ARM I saw around 5 to 6x slowdown in the...

...e", + data=d.glmm) iteration 1 Erreur dans model.frame.default(formula = ~Longitude + Latitude + bidon les longueurs des variables diff?rent (trouv? pour 'bidon') Sorry about the french here... It is just saying that variables have different lengths. Which is obviously untrue, as they all are columns of the same data frame. The search() shows that I have attached the data.frame, as it is told in some FAQs. If somebody has an idea on how to sort this issue out, I would appreciate ! Another question: is the option correlation active in the latest version of lmer ? If...

...ng their sacred impressions to cold-blooded verification. But it is the triumph of scientific men to rise superior to such superstitions, to devise tests by which the value of beliefs may be ascertained, and to feel sufficiently masters of themselves to discard contemptuously whatever may be found untrue." --Sir Francis Galton, FRS [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...wiw. Then I found this: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022780.html >For Syslinux (BIOS and EFI) in the .iso file: >_ the user might assume that the system can boot from optical media >not only in BIOS mode but also in UEFI mode (sadly, the latter is >currently untrue); That looks to be my problem. >Realistically, less and less users are using optical media, >especially on newer computers (which are of course UEFI systems). >This means that investing resources in Syslinux development with the >specific goal of achieving bootable optical media...

In a discussion a few weeks back, it was mentioned that the Best Practices Guide says something like "Don''t put more than ___ disks into a single vdev." At first, I challenged this idea, because I see no reason why a 21-disk raidz3 would be bad. It seems like a good thing. I was operating on assumption that resilver time was limited by sustainable throughput of disks, which

Talin wrote: > Jon wrote: > > Talin wrote: > > > Garbage collection is still way too difficult. > > > > This is completely untrue. > > I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree... I failed to get my point across. You're still talking about the difficulty of using LLVM's GC support. I was talking about circumventing it. The shadow stack HLVM uses does not work as you describe and it makes no use of LLVM&...

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:33:15AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > it's hard enough for the average user to find out how to compile > > source > > packages and checkout from CVS. The Ogg sources also includes a > > debian/ > > dir and it was much easier to build deb packages from this. Sorry, I'm just coming in in the middle of this, but I second any

...easy to have your fork > somewhere where no one else sees it and your changes get lost and > forgotten. Actually that's true today with svn. We have a ton of changes here we'd like to submit but the process is really painful. > Your point about small incremental commits is also untrue. svn > encourages small incremental commits and, more importantly, encourages > small incremental pushes upstream. An svn commit is an expensive operation. A git commit is a cheap operation. That's why I'm referring to. Development inertia under svn tends to steer the develope...