Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "unthrashed".
Did you mean:
unhashed
2015 Jul 17
0
[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan
...would be more beneficial than caching writes, especially
with a backup target where a write already written will likely never be read
again (and isnt a big deal if it is since so few files are changed compared to
the total # of inodes to scan).
Your report of the minutes for the re-sync shows the unthrashed cache is highly
valuable. So all we need to do is tune the backup target (and even the operational
servers themselves) to maintain more metadata. I dont know how much ram is used
per inode, but I'd throw in another 4-8gb just for metadata caching per box, or
even more, if it meant scanning was...
2015 Jul 17
3
[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
--- Comment #8 from Chip Schweiss <chip at innovates.com> ---
I would argue that optionally all directory scanning should be made parallel.
Modern file systems perform best when request queues are kept full. The
current mode of rsync scanning directories does nothing to take advantage of
this.
I currently use scripts to split a couple