search for: untenably

please reply to hdgbyi@public.guangzhou.gd.cn or bgpgong@hotmail.com, thank you. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By reanalysing the experiment of Heisenberg Gamma-Ray Microscope and one of ideal experiment from which uncertainty principle is derived , it is found that actually uncertainty principle can not be obtained from these two ideal experiments . And it is found that

please reply to hdgbyi@public.guangzhou.gd.cn or bcpgong@hotmail.com, thank you. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By reanalysing the experiment of Heisenberg Gamma-Ray Microscope and one of ideal experiment from which uncertainty principle is derived , it is found that actually uncertainty principle can not be obtained from these two ideal experiments . And it is found that

Hi, I'm trying to emit FP_ROUND f64 -> f32 considering a mips target that only supports single float point operations. The problem is that f32 is considered legal on this target but f64 doesn't and the only way I can codegen this instruction is using setConvertAction(MVT::f64, MVT::f32, Expand), which issues a EmitStackConvert. What if I want a libcall instead? What should I do? The

Basic support for Small bss and data. The rest is implemented with target specific logic and will be commited as soon as it's ok to commit this patch. -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smallsections.patch

I'm now up&running with - mISDN with avmfritz driver for Fritz PCI card - chan_capi from debian recompiled with a patch (see below) - EuroISDN with Point-to-Point (ptp) mode (Austria) - With Asterisk 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k from debian sarge But am having some problems: 1) I needed to patch chan_capi.c from debian sarge (see below) to give the new channel to asterisk in state

Hello: Is there a command in virsh to shutdown all domains? I can do one at a time, but that is untenable for a large number of domains. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net CentOS 5.4 VPS with unmetered bandwidth only $25/month! 7 day no risk trial, Google Checkout accepted

Hi all, I'm seeing Dovecot include the string "MISSING_DOMAIN" in fetch envelope requests when an mailbox's `addr-spec` part does not have a `domain` part. For example: > C: a022 uid fetch 40 (envelope rfc822.header) > S: * 5 FETCH (UID 40 ENVELOPE ("Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:53:05 +1000" > "test {{name}}" (("Michael Gratton" NIL

On 6/7/18 8:37 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > On 8 June 2018 at 12:21, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: >> On 8 June 2018 at 12:09, PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: >> [...] >>> /usr/bin/ld -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o sshconnect.o sshconnect2.o mux.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,noexecstack

On 10/30/13 03:17 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote: > > On 10/29/13 07:27 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com

Hi Mon Ping, > I would like to make it illegal to GEP into a vector as I think it is > cleaner and more consistent. Opinions? Comments? now that arrays are first class types, I think vectors should become a subclass of ArrayType. This would get rid of a lot of duplicated code, and also fix a bunch of problems with vectors (eg: that sizes are wrong; currently we think that a <n x

Hi Eduardo, > I'm a little new to LLVM. > I know that the backends are still in experimental stage. MSIL and MIPS > would be very useful for a project that I'm working on. Do you have any > plans to have it completed in the next few months? I could generate the > MSIL assembly but when compiled it, which compiles sucessfully, it > generates invalid opcode errors. As

> Ok, I'll wait for a more detailed description > You can report directly at http://www.llvm.org/bugs/ This seems to be MSIL related, not MIPS. I don't think anyone will be interested in fixing problems of this backend -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> Ok, I'll wait for a more detailed description >> You can report directly at http://www.llvm.org/bugs/ > This seems to be MSIL related, not MIPS. I don't think anyone will be > interested in fixing problems of this backend oops! :) -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes

On 02/01/18 16:33, Ben Lindstrom wrote: > And how many annoying "Do you really want to do this?" type questions > do you prompt the user and assume it is "fine"? I think zero.? I think the warning goes in the man page: ? --allow-insecure-short-key? This option allows use of keys shorter than 1024 bits, however, it is known that such keys can be broken quite

------------------------------------------------------------------------- (deutsche Version unten) Dear SuSE Linux User, thank you for your message regarding "Unknown Exception (feedback@suse.de)". Please note that the email address you sent your message to (feedback@suse.de) is no longer in use. Of course you still can send us your ideas, comments and bug reports related to our

Hi, The code that I was using was this: http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=nbody&lang=gcc&id=1 I followed the footsteps for compiling it to BC than I took the BC code and compiled it with ilasm2 (Mono). After that I tried to run the .exe with mono and it gave me a invalid opcode. I wish I could give more information about the bug but my ext3fs partition crashed

Hello everyone, I'm a little new to LLVM. I know that the backends are still in experimental stage. MSIL and MIPS would be very useful for a project that I'm working on. Do you have any plans to have it completed in the next few months? I could generate the MSIL assembly but when compiled it, which compiles sucessfully, it generates invalid opcode errors.

Any word about this issue? Should I file a bug in an actual bug tracker or something? //Mike On Sat, 15 Aug, 2020 at 13:26, Michael Gratton <mike at vee.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing Dovecot include the string "MISSING_DOMAIN" in fetch > envelope requests when an mailbox's `addr-spec` part does not have a > `domain` part. > > For example:

Hi, well, I downloaded the head revision of llvm and llvm-gcc. As you said it hangs at: Formal argument #0 has unhandled type f32 /home/julio/trunk/llvm-gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c:1765: internal compiler error: Abortado Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Actually, I don't need fp, there is any way to disable? By the way, I'm working with a MIPS coprocessor

Hi Julio, On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Julio <julio.martin.hidalgo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to compile llvm-gcc to crosscompile mips. I have already > modified a config.gcc to add mips as a target with llvm, but it gives me > "Did not get a target machine!" (from llvm-backend.cpp). > > I thought that I had to modify TargetMachOWriterInfo.h