search for: unten

please reply to hdgbyi@public.guangzhou.gd.cn or bgpgong@hotmail.com, thank you. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By reanalysing the experiment of Heisenberg Gamma-Ray Microscope and one of ideal experiment from which uncertainty principle is derived , it is found that actually uncertainty principle can not be obtained from these two ideal experiments . And it is found that uncertainty principle is unt...

please reply to hdgbyi@public.guangzhou.gd.cn or bcpgong@hotmail.com, thank you. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By reanalysing the experiment of Heisenberg Gamma-Ray Microscope and one of ideal experiment from which uncertainty principle is derived , it is found that actually uncertainty principle can not be obtained from these two ideal experiments . And it is found that uncertainty principle is unt...

...StackConvert. What if I want a libcall instead? What should I do? The libcall FROUND_F64_F32 is there, but it seems that it cannot be reached without hacking. What should I do to support this? Am I missing something? Thanks, -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative."

Basic support for Small bss and data. The rest is implemented with target specific logic and will be commited as soon as it's ok to commit this patch. -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smallsections.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2454 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/200...

...that these calls always end up in the default (s) extension. Please don't tell me that PTP will not work with the Fritz card -- this is only true for the closed-source Fritz driver. Dialplan for incoming calls: [extern] exten => 0,1,Noop() exten => 0,2,Noop(0) exten => 0,3,Dial(${UNTEN}) exten => 0,4,Busy() exten => 0,104,Busy() exten => 11,1,Noop() exten => 11,2,Noop(11) exten => 11,3,Dial(${UNTEN}) exten => 11,4,Busy() exten => 11,104,Busy() exten => 13,1,Noop() exten => 13,2,Noop(13) exten => 13,3,Playtones(busy) exten => 13,4,Busy() exten =&gt...

Hello: Is there a command in virsh to shutdown all domains? I can do one at a time, but that is untenable for a large number of domains. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net CentOS 5.4 VPS with unmetered bandwidth only $25/month! 7 day no risk trial, Google Checkout accepted

...ing it from providing an appropriately localised explanation or visual indication of the problem in the user interface, or simply avoid ever requesting IMAP envelopes from the server and always download and parse the complete RFC822 headers itself (as I believe Thunderbird does). The former is untenable since "MISSING_DOMAIN" does not mean anything to non-English speakers, the latter is untenable since it unnecessarily inflates the of volume of data that must be transmitted over the wire to work around a server bug. In these cases, or when any other part of a required IMAP addres...

...t $LD and if you want > to override the linker you would have to use the corresponding > compiler option such as gcc's -fuse-ld. That would be simpler than > trying to code around this particular problem. The build certainly works if unset LD or LD=gcc so it's certainly not untenable; just a bit befuddling it you've got LD=ld in use. I'm curious as to what's unique/new here -- as I've typically got LD=ld set (by env) for other builds, and don't see this problem. I've also built previous versions of openssh, with earlier versions of GCC/LD (pre r...

...39;m objecting to 1 month for svn trunk - 2 months notice is even pushing it imho. 1) This is imho not the small change which it's being presented as 2) As someone else stated - there are projects tracking svn trunk and telling them to just stop doing that and follow the previous release is untenable without sufficient notice. (It just doesn't seem fair) May I humbly propose you create a c++11-development branch now/later/anytime and let people start using that. In parallel to that let people know that pieces of the c++11 branch will potentially start merging Feb 1st 2014. (roughly...

...should become a subclass of ArrayType. This would get rid of a lot of duplicated code, and also fix a bunch of problems with vectors (eg: that sizes are wrong; currently we think that a <n x i1> has length n bits, and that a vector <n x x86_fp80> has length 80*n bits, both of which are untenable). From this point of view you have to allow GEP into a vector; the conclusion I suppose is that codegen needs to replace GEP+load or GEP+store with an extract or insert operation. Ciao, Duncan.

...hich compiles sucessfully, it > generates invalid opcode errors. As Eric said, it should work fine for simple code, if you have anything that isn't compiling, please report bugs so I can try fix them for you! Thanks, -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative."

> Ok, I'll wait for a more detailed description > You can report directly at http://www.llvm.org/bugs/ This seems to be MSIL related, not MIPS. I don't think anyone will be interested in fixing problems of this backend -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

...e detailed description >> You can report directly at http://www.llvm.org/bugs/ > This seems to be MSIL related, not MIPS. I don't think anyone will be > interested in fixing problems of this backend oops! :) -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative."

On 02/01/18 16:33, Ben Lindstrom wrote: > And how many annoying "Do you really want to do this?" type questions > do you prompt the user and assume it is "fine"? I think zero.? I think the warning goes in the man page: ? --allow-insecure-short-key? This option allows use of keys shorter than 1024 bits, however, it is known that such keys can be broken quite

------------------------------------------------------------------------- (deutsche Version unten) Dear SuSE Linux User, thank you for your message regarding "Unknown Exception (feedback@suse.de)". Please note that the email address you sent your message to (feedback@suse.de) is no longer in use. Of course you still can send us your ideas, comments and bug reports related to our pr...

...hich compiles sucessfully, it > generates invalid opcode errors. As Eric said, it should work fine for simple code, if you have anything that isn't compiling, please report bugs so I can try fix them for you! Thanks, -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative." _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text att...

Hello everyone, I'm a little new to LLVM. I know that the backends are still in experimental stage. MSIL and MIPS would be very useful for a project that I'm working on. Do you have any plans to have it completed in the next few months? I could generate the MSIL assembly but when compiled it, which compiles sucessfully, it generates invalid opcode errors.

...priately localised > explanation or visual indication of the problem in the user > interface, or simply avoid ever requesting IMAP envelopes from the > server and always download and parse the complete RFC822 headers > itself (as I believe Thunderbird does). > > The former is untenable since "MISSING_DOMAIN" does not mean anything > to non-English speakers, the latter is untenable since it > unnecessarily inflates the of volume of data that must be transmitted > over the wire to work around a server bug. > > In these cases, or when any other part...

...you begin the cross-compilation using llvm-gcc TOT, > and > when it breaks, use cc1 directly to emit llvm bytecode specific for mips. > Then, > use llc. > If you have doubts, just ask :) > > -- > Bruno Cardoso Lopes > http://www.brunocardoso.cc > "When faced with untenable alternatives, you > should consider your imperative." > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part...

...'m working right now. What I suggest is that you begin the cross-compilation using llvm-gcc TOT, and when it breaks, use cc1 directly to emit llvm bytecode specific for mips. Then, use llc. If you have doubts, just ask :) -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc "When faced with untenable alternatives, you should consider your imperative."