search for: untangled

I have recently installed new untangle firewalls ( untangle.com) in Bridge mode at two office locations. Both offices collect mail from a Fedora 9, postfix,dovecot server at location #1. Since the install of the untangles i have been plagued by Thunderbird Errors while trying to POP email. The error says "RETR" command failed. If the user logs into the webmail (Squirrelmail) on the

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:30:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I am inclined to say, for 4.10 let's revert > c7070619f3408d9a0dffbed9149e6f00479cf43b since what it fixes is not a > regression in 4.10. No complaints there, as long as we can keep working to fix this for 4.11 and onwards. You'll also need to cc stable on the revert. > So I think we can defer the fix to

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:40:49PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:30:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I am inclined to say, for 4.10 let's revert > > > c7070619f3408d9a0dffbed9149e6f00479cf43b since what it fixes is not a > > > regression in 4.10. >

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:31:18PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On ARM (and other archs such as > Power), having a mismatch between a cacheable and a non-cacheable mapping > can result in a loss of coherency between the two (for example, if the > non-cacheable gues accesses bypass the cache, but the cacheable host > accesses allocate in the cache). I guess it's an optimization

* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> > > Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious > reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h > from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* > that don't already #include it.

Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> writes: > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> > > Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious > reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h > from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* > that don't already #include it.

Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> writes: > On 02/12/2018 04:28 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> writes: >> >>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> >>> >>> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious >>> reason. It looks like it's

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:31:18PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On ARM (and other archs such as > Power), having a mismatch between a cacheable and a non-cacheable mapping > can result in a loss of coherency between the two (for example, if the > non-cacheable gues accesses bypass the cache, but the cacheable host > accesses allocate in the cache). I guess it's an optimization

On 02/02/17 11:26, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> I'd like to do that instead. It's fastboot doing the unreasonable thing >>>> here and deviating from

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:25:57PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > By forcing on DMA API usage for ARM systems, we have inadvertently > kicked open a hornets' nest in terms of cache-coherency. Namely that > unless the virtio device is explicitly described as capable of coherent > DMA by firmware, the DMA APIs on ARM and other DT-based platforms will > assume it is non-coherent.

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:58:10PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 02/01/2017 08:19 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:25:57PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > > > diff --git

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:25:57PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > By forcing on DMA API usage for ARM systems, we have inadvertently > kicked open a hornets' nest in terms of cache-coherency. Namely that > unless the virtio device is explicitly described as capable of coherent > DMA by firmware, the DMA APIs on ARM and other DT-based platforms will > assume it is non-coherent.

On 02/02/17 16:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:34:03PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: >> On 02/02/17 11:26, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin

Someone sent me a bug report for survival2.44.1-1 that involves a model with both cluster and offset.? It turns out to be a 3 part issue with [.terms and my own untangle.specials routine.?? I've spent an evening sorting out the details. ? 1. The delete.response() function doesn't remove the response from the dataClasses attribute, which leads to a later failure in [.terms for

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:25:57PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > > index 7e38ed79c3fc..961af25b385c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:40:49PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:30:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I am inclined to say, for 4.10 let's revert > > c7070619f3408d9a0dffbed9149e6f00479cf43b since what it fixes is not a > > regression in 4.10. > > No complaints there, as long as we can keep working to fix this for 4.11 > and

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:40:49PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:30:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I am inclined to say, for 4.10 let's revert > > c7070619f3408d9a0dffbed9149e6f00479cf43b since what it fixes is not a > > regression in 4.10. > > No complaints there, as long as we can keep working to fix this for 4.11 > and

On 02/12/2018 04:28 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> writes: > >> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> >> >> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious >> reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h >> from slab.h and add

On 02/12/2018 04:28 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> writes: > >> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> >> >> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious >> reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h >> from slab.h and add

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:34:03PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 02/02/17 11:26, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>> I'd like to do that instead.